Intra-topic latency as an automated behavioral marker of treatment response in autism spectrum disorder.

When the analyses were limited to the dyads who had same examiners at pre- and post-interventions (n = 75 out of 140 dyads; 53.6%), the interaction effect between time and treatment condition remained marginally significant, potentially due to limited statistical power ( F [1, 183] = 2.94, p = 0.088 for child latency; F [1, 183] = 2.83, p = 0.095 for examiner latency).

also in 26,082 other papers