Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Sex differences in the intrinsic reading neural networks of Chinese children.

Dev Cogn Neurosci · 2022 · PMC8943427 · PMID 35325839

2
hedged sentences
0.0580
closest p · 1.2× alpha
0.0580
boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.058so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
3 Results 3.1 Behavioural results As seen from Table 1 , there was a marginally significant difference between the boys and girls in reading accuracy, as reflected by character recognition (t = 1.916, df = 101.9, p = 0.058), but the sex difference in reading comprehension, as reflected by silent sentence reading, was not significant (t = 1.200, df = 94.713, p = 0.233).

also in 26,082 other papers

an increasing trendno p-value reported
Besides, the RSFC of the left dIFG with the right IOG, whose strength is higher in girls than boys, showed an increasing trend with age for boys, while kept relatively stable with age for girls.

also in 63,971 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.