a decreasing trendp = 0.051
There was no significant change in the length of a gait cycle, although there was a decreasing trend after the intervention ( Figure 2 b; pre, 1.31 ± 0.32 s; post, 1.25 ± 0.29 s, p = 0.051, Z = 2.90, r = 0.52).
There was no significant change in the length of a gait cycle, although there was a decreasing trend after the intervention ( Figure 2 b; pre, 1.31 ± 0.32 s; post, 1.25 ± 0.29 s, p = 0.051, Z = 2.90, r = 0.52).