extremely significantp < 0.00001
As shown in Figure 4 , the results of the right M1 group showed no significant indigenous effect ( Z = 1.04, p = 0.30), and there was still extremely significant heterogeneity (Chi 2 = 51.77, p < 0.00001, I 2 = 90%).
As shown in Figure 4 , the results of the right M1 group showed no significant indigenous effect ( Z = 1.04, p = 0.30), and there was still extremely significant heterogeneity (Chi 2 = 51.77, p < 0.00001, I 2 = 90%).
The results did not find that the TTE significantly improved, indicating that the use of tDCS in improving the baseline level of the subjects’ endurance may not be significant.