marginally significantP = .051
Sensitivity was highest in the tactile combined-level method (99.99%), but was not significantly different from the visual combined-level method (89.17%), as shown in Figure 3A . In Figure 3B , the level effect for specificity was marginally significant ( F = 6.840, P = .051), but the modality effect was not statistically significant ( F = 1.314, P = .351).