Working Memory Capacity of Biological Motion's Basic Unit: Decomposing Biological Motion From the Perspective of Systematic Anatomy.

The main effect of set size was significant [ F (3.02, 184.14) = 24.81, p < 0.001]; the main effect of complexity was significant [ F (1, 61) = 8.68, p = 0.005]; the main effect of interference was not significant [ F (1, 61) = 2.09, p = 0.153]; the interaction between set size and complexity was marginally significant [ F (3.02, 184.14) = 2.37, p = 0.072]; the interaction between set size and interference was not significant [ F (3.02, 184.14) = 0.60, p = 0.618]; the interaction between complexity and interference was not significant [ F (1, 61) = 0.93, p = 0.339]; the interaction between these 3 variance was not significant [ F (3.02, 184.14) = 0.73, p = 0.535].

also in 26,082 other papers

Considering that this is an exploratory study, marginal significance can also make us more convinced of the alternative hypothesis to a certain extent ( Pritschet et al., 2016 ), so we further conducted a mixed-design ANOVA under different interference task conditions.

also in 5,069 other papers