highly significantP = 0.001
While MR-assessed SAT (cm 2 ) and MR-VAT (cm 2 ) were again both numerically lower in these smaller stature Chinese women, notably this difference was highly significant for MR-SAT ( P = 0.001, Figure 1 ) but not for MR-VAT ( P > 0.05) which was not significantly different from the Caucasian subcohort.