close to significancep = 0.056
230 ± 104 s PR, p = 0.588), although the PR exhibited a greater time spent at peak V̇O 2 close to significance (117 ± 114 vs. 158 ± 109 s, p = 0.056).
230 ± 104 s PR, p = 0.588), although the PR exhibited a greater time spent at peak V̇O 2 close to significance (117 ± 114 vs. 158 ± 109 s, p = 0.056).