An evaluation to determine if reading the mind in the eyes scores can be improved through training.

PLoS One · 2022 · PMC9049333 · PMID 35482660

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0700

closest p · 1.4× alpha

0.1000

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = .07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The test revealed a statistically significant difference in change in scores between high ( M = -1.45, SD = 2.9) and low ( M = 1.7, SD = 4.1) initial RMET ability ( F (1, 232) = 48.38, p < .001, d = 0.17) and a marginally significant difference between training conditions ( F (2, 232) = 2.74, p = .07).

also in 26,082 other papers

marginal significancep < .10so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Results at the p < .05 level are reported as statistically significant, while marginal significance is assigned to those at the p < .10 [ 39 ].

also in 5,069 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.