We found a similar pattern of results regarding error rates as well, however, the effects were statistically significant only for inhibition (t (28) = 2.97; 4.5%; p = 0.031) and updating (t (28) = 7.94; 7.2%; p < 0.001), while dual-tasking (t (28) = 0.63; 0.7%; p = 0.515) and switching (t (28) = 0.79; 1.1%; p = 0.430) failed to reach significance (Fig. 1 b).
← all excerpts
Characterising the unity and diversity of executive functions in a within-subject fMRI study.
1
—
—