The mode difference was marginally significant, with FTFI participants reporting more discordantly with biological marker results than ACASI participants in the study by Mensch et al [ 46 ], since ACASI participants were 0.8 times more likely than FTFI participants to report no sex in the past 2 days despite positive RSID results (95% CI 0.6-1.0; P =.10).
← all excerpts
Comparison of the ACASI Mode to Other Survey Modes in Sexual Behavior Surveys in Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic Literature Review.
1
—
—