marginally significantP = .056
The main effect of orientation was marginally significant [ F (1, 30) = 3.95, P = .056], showing faster RTs for upright hand postures (635 ms) compared with inverted hand postures (645 ms).
The main effect of orientation was marginally significant [ F (1, 30) = 3.95, P = .056], showing faster RTs for upright hand postures (635 ms) compared with inverted hand postures (645 ms).