Barely Significant
← all excerpts

DOACs or VKAs or LMWH - What is the optimal regimen for cancer-associated venous thromboembolism? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ann Med Surg (Lond) · 2022 · PMC9289311 · PMID 35860059

2
hedged sentences
closest p
boldest claim

The sentences

borderline significantno p-value reported
4.4 Pulmonary embolism (PE) The DOAC therapy does reduce the incidence of PE in patients with active cancer compared to LMWH but there was borderline significant difference between the DOAC and LMWH groups in the incidence of pulmonary embolism amongst cancer patients (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47–1.06; P = 0.10; I 2 = 7%) ( Fig. 4 ). 4.5 All-cause mortality Pooled analysis shows a lower rate of mortality in patients treated with DOACs compared to conventional therapy of either VKA or LMWH, however, no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups of cancer patients.

also in 11,409 other papers

borderline significanceno p-value reported
Secondly, DOACs have also shown borderline significance in reducing the risk of developing PE as well as reducing mortality rates amongst all cancer patients ( Fig. 4 , Fig. 5 ).

also in 7,017 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.