Differential activation of a frontoparietal network explains population-level differences in statistical learning from speech.

PLoS Biol · 2022 · PMC9292101 · PMID 35793349

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0550

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0550

boldest claim

The sentences

close to significancep = 0.055so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

The mixed-model analysis of this dataset yielded a significant difference between conditions (main effect of Condition (PL > AS), χ2 = 5.40, p < 0.05)), and a main effect of group close to significance (Highs > Lows; χ2 = 3.67, p = 0.055), and a trending Condition*Group interaction (χ2 = 2.74, p = 0.098).

also in 2,130 other papers

marginally significantno p-value reported

All networks were significantly activated during AS for both high and low synchronizers, except for the frontoparietal, which was only active for the high and the auditory, which was marginally significant for the lows ( p unc = 0.03).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.