marginally significantp = 0.048
Cueing also had a marginally significant effect on FAR ( F [1, 18] = 4.488, p = 0.048, η 2 = 0.2) with more false alarms when the target appeared at uncued positions.
Cueing also had a marginally significant effect on FAR ( F [1, 18] = 4.488, p = 0.048, η 2 = 0.2) with more false alarms when the target appeared at uncued positions.