Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Can morphotaxa be assessed with photographs? Estimating the accuracy of two-dimensional cranial geometric morphometrics for the study of threatened populations of African monkeys.

Anat Rec (Hoboken) · 2022 · PMC9298422 · PMID 34596361

2
hedged sentences
0.0100
closest p · 0.2× alpha
0.0500
boldest claim

The sentences

highly significantp < .01actually significant
In contrast, all test statistics are significant (with most highly significant— p < .01) when 2D is compared with 3D using FULL‐1 and RED‐4.

also in 132,142 other papers

marginally significantp > .05actually significant
The difference in the magnitude of variance between the first and second digitization of the 2D photographs is significant only for VAR2 (.05 > p > .01) and marginally significant (.1 > p > .05) for VAR1, with absolute deviations from the means of the two replicates accounting for less than 1% of variation (Table 5 ).

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.