When the Counterpart Chooses the Opposite: The First Mover's Anticipation and Evaluation of the Final Feedback in Gambles.

Front Neurosci · 2022 · PMC9400596 · PMID 36033619

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0550

closest p · 1.1× alpha

0.0550

boldest claim

The sentences

marginally significantp = 0.055so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Feedback-Related Negativity at the Feedback Evaluation Stage During the feedback evaluation stage, the ANOVA results showed that the main effect of consistency was marginally significant [ F (1,18) = 4.193, p = 0.055, η 2 = 0.189] and the main effect of feedback valence was significant [ F (1,18) = 10.956, p = 0.004, η 2 = 0.378].

also in 26,082 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.