Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Comparison of accuracy between digital and conventional implant impressions: two and three dimensional evaluations.

J Adv Prosthodont · 2022 · PMC9444482 · PMID 36105881

2
hedged sentences
0.0010
closest p · 0.0× alpha
0.0010
boldest claim

The sentences

extremely significantP <.001actually significant
For a unilateral arch implant and the mandible models with two implants, no significant difference was observed in the accuracy between the digital and conventional implant impressions on scan bodies; however, the corresponding differences for trans-arch implants and mandible with six implants were extremely significant ( P <.001).

also in 7,787 other papers

a decreasing trendno p-value reported
Optical impressions have been reported to markedly reduce patients’ discomfort 26 , 27 compared with the previous impression technique, which was not technically demanding and sensitive; 28 , 29 therefore, the digital technique could be the alternative to the conventional impression technique, with the popularity of latter showing a decreasing trend. 30 The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy between digital impressions and conventional impressions on the implant models.

also in 47,180 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.