a positive trendp = 0.054
Following HBOT, there was a positive trend in the firm surface total score (4.7 ± 3.0 to 3.4 ± 2.9, p = 0.054) with a large effect size of 0.99 compared to the sham group (4.2 ± 3.0 to 5.1 ± 2.9, p = 0.20).
Following HBOT, there was a positive trend in the firm surface total score (4.7 ± 3.0 to 3.4 ± 2.9, p = 0.054) with a large effect size of 0.99 compared to the sham group (4.2 ± 3.0 to 5.1 ± 2.9, p = 0.20).