highly significantp < .001
After controlling for family net worth ( Appendix Table 2 , Model 4), the difference in scores decreased further to roughly −1.1 but remained highly significant ( p < .001).
After controlling for family net worth ( Appendix Table 2 , Model 4), the difference in scores decreased further to roughly −1.1 but remained highly significant ( p < .001).
Although the difference decreased in magnitude and significance, it remained marginally significant (−0.374, p < .10).
Age at interview, a diabetes diagnosis, being in the lowest quartile of net worth relative to the top quartile, and reporting fair or poor health as a child was associated with increased odds of cognitive impairment but were only marginally statistically significant, holding other factors constant.