tended toward significancep = 0.052
This effect in females was significant for the 0.06 M ( p < 0.01), 0.1 M ( p < 0.05), and 1 M ( p < 0.01) solutions and tended toward significance for the 0.03 M ( p = 0.052) and 0.6 M ( p = 0.059) solutions.
This effect in females was significant for the 0.06 M ( p < 0.01), 0.1 M ( p < 0.05), and 1 M ( p < 0.01) solutions and tended toward significance for the 0.03 M ( p = 0.052) and 0.6 M ( p = 0.059) solutions.
Regarding the lick score ( Figure 7 D), the analysis revealed that the concentration × diet interaction was significant ( p < 0.01), indicating an increase of the lick score in CAFR animals at 0.3 M ( p < 0.05) compared to CAF, with 1 M being close to significance ( p = 0.055).
The analysis of the diet × exercise × concentration interaction showed a tendency toward significance in males ( p = 0.092) but not in females ( p = 0.108).