Comparison between EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy with or without rapid on-site evaluation for tissue sampling of solid pancreatic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Endosc Ultrasound · 2022 · PMC9921973 · PMID 36537383

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentence

0.0800

closest p · 1.6× alpha

0.0800

boldest claim

The sentences

a nonsignificant trendP = 0.08so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)

Of note, no heterogeneity was observed in the analysis restricted to end-cutting EUS-FNB needles (OR = 1.85, 0.53–6.51, P = 0.34; I 2 = 0%) and a nonsignificant trend toward higher sample adequacy with EUS-FNB + ROSE was registered when reverse bevel needles were used (OR = 2.33, 0.91–5.95, P = 0.08; I 2 = 39%).

also in 5,406 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.