,[ 20 ] who reported a much lower MD on Humphrey visual field assessment using SITA-standard as −4.95 D (SD 5 D).[ 28 ] This might be because exclusively POAG-diagnosed patients were included in our study compared to normal, diagnosed, and suspect cases in the study by Meyer et al .[ 20 ] We studied the correlation of VCDR with DDLS scoring using Pearson’s coefficient ( r ) and found a highly significant positive correlation between these two parameters.
← all excerpts
Assessment of optic disk by disk damage likelihood scale staging using slit-lamp biomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography in diagnosing primary open-angle glaucoma.
1
—
—