Intraparietal stimulation disrupts negative distractor effects in human multi-alternative decision-making.

Elife · 2023 · PMC9946441 · PMID 36811348

Europe PMC DOI

hedged sentences

0.0440

closest p · 0.9× alpha

0.0440

boldest claim

The sentences

marginal significancep = 0.044actually significant

One statistical concern for the paper is that the primary TMS results are supported by effects with relatively marginal significance: three way interaction for D-HV p = 0.044, contralateral site x stimulation ANOVA p = 0.034, contralateral MIP stimulation ANOVA p = 0.049.

also in 5,069 other papers

a positive trendno p-value reported

Why is the data binned in to 4 bins? And not just a continuous regression reported? I suspect the figure is trying to demonstrate a positive trend as a function of D, but no statistical tests are run on these bins (and none seem significant).

also in 11,005 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.