highly significantp=0.008
By using next generation sequencing (NGS), the decreased SHM frequency was also highly significant ( Figure 2C , 12.3‰ vs 8.3‰, p=0.008, individual mice in Supplementary Table S2A ).
By using next generation sequencing (NGS), the decreased SHM frequency was also highly significant ( Figure 2C , 12.3‰ vs 8.3‰, p=0.008, individual mice in Supplementary Table S2A ).