Barely Significant
← all excerpts

Performance of bedside tools for predicting infection-related mortality and administrative data for sepsis surveillance: An observational cohort study.

PLoS One · 2023 · PMC9980760 · PMID 36862700

1
hedged sentence
0.0700
closest p · 1.4× alpha
0.0700
boldest claim

The sentences

not quite statistically significantp = 0.07so close (0.05 < p ≤ 0.1)
For ward patients (n = 571) who were not admitted to critical care during the 48hrs pre or post onset of infection NEWS predicted 30-day mortality (AUROC 0.80, 95%CI 0.73–0.86) better across all values than any other tool (SOFA, 0.73, 95%CI 0.66–0.80; SIRS, 0.70, 95% CI 0.64–0.77; qSOFA, 0.72, 95%CI 0.65–0.80), although the difference for SOFA was not quite statistically significant (DeLong’s p = 0.07), in predicting 30-day mortality but performed significantly better than SIRS (p = 0.003) or qSOFA (p = 0.007).

also in 341 other papers

Quoted from the open-access full text in Europe PMC under the licence the publisher applied. The sentence is reproduced exactly as published; the emphasis is ours.