Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,451 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Age-standardized estimates of overall herpes zoster occurrence increased from 2.77/1,000 to 5.25/1,000 (90%) in the period 1999–2003, and the trend in both crude and adjusted rates was highly significant (p < 0.001).
highly significantp < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
Although all time points demonstrated highly significant statistical differences between classes ( p < 0.001), the gap between Class 1 and Class 2 narrowed over time, with their difference decreasing from 1.25 points at T1 to 0.43 points by T4, while Class 3 remained distinctly lower throughout all time points (Fig. 3 ).
an increasing trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Secular trend of KD incidence The KD incidence of subjects younger than 18 years significantly increased from 11.78 per 100,000 person-years in 2001 to 22.40 per 100,000 person-years in 2020 (AAPC = 5.4%, p < 0.001, Table 1 ), and 97.1% of KD patients were aged 0–5 years, which also demonstrated an increasing trend with an AAPC of 4.2% ( p < 0.001, Table 1 ; Fig. 1 a).
marginally significantP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
When PIR was examined as a categorical variable, individuals in the highest PIR tertile exhibited a 0.1 lower TyG index compared to those in the lowest tertile in the crude model(β = -0.10, 95% CI:-0.13~-0.06, P < 0.001); Following adjustments in both Model 1 and 2, the association between PIR and TyG remained marginally significant (β =-0.17, 95% CI:-0.21~-0.13, P < 0.001 and β = -0.11, 95% CI:-0.15~-0.07, P < 0.001, respectively).
an increasing trendP < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Regarding age distribution, the number of psychogenic AEFI cases in the age groups ≤ 6, 7–17, and ≥ 18 years were 20, 61, and 340, respectively, corresponding to a proportion rate of 0.02%(95% CI: 0.01–0.03), 0.07%(95% CI: 0.05–0.09), and 0.38%(95% CI: 0.34–0.42), respectively, showing an increasing trend with age ( P < 0.001).
highly significantP < 0.0010.0× alphaqualifiedgold
The results showed that, compared to students with a “Vitality Type” lifestyle, those with a “Crisis Type” or “Adjustment Type” lifestyle had 6.99 times and 2.29 times the risk, respectively, of being at a low level of physical activity, with these differences being highly significant ( P < 0.001).