It also revealed three PCs with highly significant differences (p<0.001) and the first three interaction principal component of AMMI, explaining 47%, 26.62%, and 17.88% of the GEI with 19, 17, and 15 degrees of freedom (df), respectively, as well as the fourth PC with significant differences (p<0.05) explaining 7.77% of the interaction with the degree with total cumulative of nearly 100%.
Excerpts
A random permutation test indicated that the proportion of variance attributable for all hierarchical levels were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The ANOVA revealed a highly significant effect of the genotype on Waudpc ( P < 0.001) ( Table 3 ).
The effect of genotype by environment interaction (GEI) was also highly significant (P< 0.001) for the majority of the traits but had no significant effect on vegetative yield.
For the set of leaf hydraulic traits, the correlation between stomatal density and stomatal length was highly significant and negative (-0.58; p < 0.001).
Phenotypic relationships between traits Highly significant relationships ( P< 0.001) were identified between the quantitative traits ( Figure 1 ).
During the wheat growing season ( Supplementary Figure S1A ), a highly significant positive correlation was identified between the yield and both the year and nitrogen application rate ( p < 0.001), whereas a highly significant negative correlation was found with the irrigation volume ( p < 0.001).
Plant vigor and tuber yield displayed a positive and highly significant correlation (0.69, p<0.001).
These two traits showed highly significant positive correlations with SG ( P < 0.001 ).
deltoidea show the weakest inhibitory activity, with an extremely significant variation compared to the drugs from the other three Coptis plants (P<0.001).
3.3 Proline and sugar content of maize seedlings Two-way ANOVA revealed highly significant effects (p < 0.001) of treatment, duration of treatment, and their interaction on the proline, sucrose, fructose, and soluble sugar contents in both the leaves and roots of maize plants.
Paired statistical tests confirmed that differences between CK and 150 NaCl were all highly significant (p < 0.001).
For relative conductivity, both G, W and their interaction were highly significant ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ).
In this controlled context ( Figure 7 ), a highly significant Treatment × Genotype × Root layer interaction ( p < 0.001) was observed for five traits.
(1) ANOVA revealed highly significant differences in germination rates among treatments (p < 0.001).
Associations were considered highly significant at a threshold of P < 0.001.
Statistical analysis ( t -test) showed highly significant ( p < 0.001) changes in C R * between any two consecutive measurement times.
However, when the air and soil variables were modeled separately, both the sub-models were found to be highly significant (air sub-model; P -value = 0.001 and soil sub-model; P -value = 0.004).
The analysis revealed a strong positive co-expression correlation between the two genes, with R = 0.95 and a highly significant p-value (p<0.001), the raw data are presented in Supplementary Table 5 .
Agronomical traits Differences among lines were highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all evaluated traits, indicating wide phenotypic variation ( Table 2 ).
Projected GLA values showed highly significant Pearson’s correlations ( p < 0.001) with fresh and dry biomass of wheat plants measured at the end of the experiment, r = 1 and r = 0.98, respectively, thus confirming the reliability of image-based shoot biomass assessment.
Under rainfed conditions, GCA m /sets, GCA f /sets and SCA/sets mean squares were highly significant ( P < 0.001) for all traits except GCA f /sets for BHC, and SCA/sets for HSL, HSW, BHC, and tassel branch length (TBL) ( Table 2 ).
The genetic differentiation coefficient among populations is 0.129 and is highly significant (P < 0.001, based on 1,000 permutations).
TCD was the sole, highly significant negative driver (β = -0.22, P < 0.001), and stand density also had a significant suppressive effect (β = -0.06, P = 0.001).
For the growth rate in ground diameter (GRD), the main effects of cultivar, time, and treatment, as well as all their interactions, exhibited highly significant effects (p<0.001, Table 3 ).