In contrast, the benthic macrofaunal communities showed highly significant variability among all flats using abundances of the 14 most frequent species (ANOSIM, global R = 0.158, P<0.001).
Excerpts
Weight was used as a proxy for body size and showed a highly significant correlation with length (r = 0.98; p<0.001).
Lysis induced by all anti-MUC1 antibodies was highly significant (p<0.001 in Student's t-test) in MUC1-expressing tumor cell lines, when compared to the ovarian cell line ES-2, the melanoma cell line SK-mel-1 and NHEC, three MUC1-negative cell lines.
Geographic distance, chronological distance, and the interaction term all have a highly significant effect ( p < .001).
In Student’s t-test both correlations were highly significant (p<0.001).
There was highly significant spatial variation in the incidence of P. falciparum ( Table 3 , any density: Χ 2 = 32.5, df = 10, p<0.001 Pf >2500: Χ 2 = 35.2, df = 5, p<0.001) and P. vivax ( Table 4 , any density: Χ 2 = 47.5, df = 10, p<0.001, Pv >500: Χ 2 = 56.5, df = 10, p<0.001) but not P. malariae episodes (any density: Χ 2 = 7.4.0, df = 10, p = 0.69).
As expected, FVB/N KLF2−/− and Tie2-cre KLF2−/− showed highly significant (p<0.001) decreases in the number of mesenchymal cells in the endocardial cushion tissue associated with the AV canal, compared to controls.
An Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) was run showing statistically highly significant effects for food quantity (p<0.001) and quality (p<0.001).
The association between overall mortality and increasing age remained highly significant when adjusted for underlying co-morbidities or immunosuppression (p = 0.001).
P values were considered as significant (*) if p<0.05, as very significant (**) if p<0.01 and as extremely significant (***) if p<0.001.
A higher BMI was consistently associated with a lower risk of death across all time periods, with log-rank tests showing highly significant results (p < 0.001).
For both HIF083 and HIF107 (‘A’ region), a highly significant (p<0.001) positive effect of Bay allele on primary root length was found, that increased the variable by 7,5–11%.
The comparison of WHO patient care indicators between APTS and Non-APTS facilities related to the average dispensing time, percentage of drugs actually dispensed and percentage of drugs adequately labeled, showed highly significant differences (p<0.001) ( Table 3 ).
100 μl was observed as early as 2 days post-infection, and by day 4 post-infection there was a highly significant difference (p<0.001) between the 10 μl volume group and each of the other experimental groups.
All simple main effects were highly significant (of the 12 tests, smallest F (2,43) = 51.3, p <.001).
The variable ‘network size’ is highly significant and positive (p<0.001), which shows that building larger networks is not a successful strategy and at the same time supports our assumption that the right network configuration is essential for success.
With respect to its role in differentiating between necrotic and viable tumor regions, a feature was deemed highly significant if P < 0.001, significant if 0.001 ≤ P < 0.05, and not significant if P ≥ 0.05.
Association between age group 30–44 years and moderate positive attitude and positive attitude was found to be highly significant ( p <0.001).
It shows a decreasing trend in the use of coffee creamer for infants previously described (3.8% in 2009 versus 18% in 2007, p<0.001) which is a real improvement [18] .
There was however a significant effect of treatment on fibre size with P-PMO treated mice having significantly larger average fibre size (Feret’s min diameter) than untreated mice (p<0.001, highly significant) ( S4 Fig ).
Among the mothers reported violent exposure, 42.27% adopted moderate disciplinary practices while 37.12% used severe disciplinary practices, indicating a highly significant association ( p < 0.001).
time point 2) confirmed that both effects were highly significant (ratio: F (2, 110) = 59.58, partial η 2 = .52, p <.001; time: F (1, 55) = 27.74, partial η 2 = .33, p <.001).
All neurocognitive measures from the LNS (forward and re-order), CVLT-II (immediate and delayed recall), and WCST-64 (perseverative responses and categories completed) revealed robust and highly significant differences (d = 0.60 to d = 1.71, p<0.001) between the SZ and NCS groups.
Prolonged treatment with MPEP (n = 4) resulted in a prominent and highly significant impairment of LTP (F 1,168 = 171.66, p<0.001 for PS; F 1,168 = 189.64, p<0.001 for fEPSP slope) ( Figure 3 , filled circles).
p <0.05 is considered significant; p <0.01 is considered highly significant; and p <0.001 is considered extremely significant.