Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,691 sentences · 1 filter applied

highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
A comparison of soil metal distributions between GC and WC systems showed that Cd concentrations had no significant change between cultivation systems ( p > 0.05), while Pb showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) across the two cultivation systems due to anthropogenic input.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Nutritional quality showed highly significant correlations with plant height and leaf length ( p < 0.01) and significant correlations with tiller number, stem diameter, and grass height ( p < 0.05), whereas the dry–to–fresh ratio was only moderately correlated with plant height and leaf length (0.01 ≤ p < 0.05).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) among RIL genotypes in each of the two replicated trials were detected by analysis of variance for TAC ( Table S1 ); the combined analysis across environments revealed significant differences for years, genotypes, and environment x genotypes interaction ( Table S2 ).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The Mantel test results demonstrated a significant or highly significant correlation between gd and ggd (R 2 = 0.1942, p < 0.01), gd and pre (R 2 = 0.2018, p < 0.01), gd and vapr (R 2 = 0.3297, p < 0.01), gd and sra (R 2 = 0.3849, p < 0.01), and gd and tmin (R 2 = 0.0536, 0.01 < p < 0.05).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Effects of Cattle Manure–Mineral Fertiliser Co-Fertilisation, and AMF Inoculation on Growth Attributes of Amaranthus Highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) were observed in plant height, number of leaves, stem girth, and root length due to the co-application of cattle manure and mineral fertiliser coupled with AMF inoculation across the cropping seasons ( Table 1 ). 2.1.1.
highly significantp ≤ 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) The analysis of variance for all measured traits revealed highly significant genotypic (G) and Genotype × environment (G × T) variations ( p ≤ 0.01), indicating substantial genetic variability among the tested wheat genotypes ( Table 2 ).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Phenotypic Variability of Measured Traits Across Seasons and Genotypes All measured traits presented highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) for treatments (irrigation levels and genotypes) and their interaction in each season, based on ANOVA.