Barely Significant

Excerpts

3,691 sentences · 1 filter applied

extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
The correlation between the number of seeds and the cell width in the middle of the mesocarp was positively correlated (0.57) in CK treatment, while the correlation decreased in A1 and A2 treatments, but it showed extremely significant positive correlation ( p < 0.01) and significant positive correlation ( p < 0.05) under A3 and A4 treatments, respectively.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation Analysis of Forage Yield Quality, Soil Physicochemical Properties, and Soil Enzyme Activities Under Different Fertilization Treatments As shown in Figure 5 a, aboveground biomass of artificial grassland exhibited highly significant correlations ( p < 0.01) with soil physicochemical properties and microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Correlation analysis confirmed that the activity of SOD and catalase (CAT) showed a highly significant positive correlation with growth indicators (r > 0.8, p < 0.01) and a highly significant negative correlation with malondialdehyde (MDA) content (r < −0.8, p < 0.01), indicating that antioxidant defense is the core pathway.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
A comparison of soil metal distributions between GC and WC systems showed that Cd concentrations had no significant change between cultivation systems ( p > 0.05), while Pb showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) across the two cultivation systems due to anthropogenic input.
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
In full-light drought conditions (T 1 , T 2 ), dry matter accumulation and photosynthetic capacity were affected, with drought duration (D n ) showing highly significant negative correlations ( p < 0.01) with most physiological parameters ( RWC , LDW , G s , T r ).
extremely significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualified
Correlation Analysis Between Nutrient Contents and Stoichiometric Characteristics of Different Components of Main Shrubs and Herbs in Karst Forests As shown in Figure 5 , for the stoichiometric characteristics of shrub leaves, the positive correlation groups were as follows: C content was significantly ( p < 0.05) positively correlated with C/K (r = 0.54); there were significant ( p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( p < 0.01) positive correlations between N content and P (r = 0.68), Ca (r = 0.62), and Mg (r = 0.60) contents, as well as between P content and Ca (r = 0.67) and Mg (r = 0.46) contents; K content was extremely significantly ( p < 0.01) positively correlated with K/P (r = 0.73); Ca content was significantly ( p < 0.05) or extremely significantly ( p < 0.01) positively correlated with Mg (r = 0.79), N/K (r = 0.61), and Ca/Mg (r = 0.47).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Further analysis of fruit quality showed highly significant positive correlations (between peel L* value and peel b* value, r = 0.98, ** p < 0.01), a highly significant negative correlation (between pH value and aroma compounds, r = −0.97, ** p < 0.01), and a highly significant positive correlation (between total phenols and tannins, r = 0.99, ** p < 0.01).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Effects of Different Degrees of Salinization on Ecosystem Carbon Exchange and Resource Use Efficiency While year and salinization significantly affected NEE ( p < 0.05) without a significant interaction, both factors along with their interaction had highly significant effects on ER and GEP ( p < 0.01, Table 1 ).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
The Mantel test results demonstrated a significant or highly significant correlation between gd and ggd (R 2 = 0.1942, p < 0.01), gd and pre (R 2 = 0.2018, p < 0.01), gd and vapr (R 2 = 0.3297, p < 0.01), gd and sra (R 2 = 0.3849, p < 0.01), and gd and tmin (R 2 = 0.0536, 0.01 < p < 0.05).
highly significantp < 0.010.2× alphaqualifiedgold
Joint ANOVA and Genetic Parameters Joint ANOVA for the treatments (environmental indices (E) and genotypes (G)) displayed highly significant differences ( p < 0.01) for all studied traits, and the interactions were significant for 12 traits and insignificant for 8 traits (DH, RWC, E, POD, Pn, Gs, PPO, and CAT) ( Table 2 ).