Within this motif, the sequence consisting of a single adenine followed by a cytosine quadruplet (ACCCC) was highly significant, occurring much more frequently than would be expected by chance ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
The overall association was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Differences were considered statistically significant at *indicates a significant difference (p < 0.05), **indicates a highly significant difference (p < 0.01), ***indicates an extremely significant difference (p < 0.001).
Differences were considered non-significant (ns) for p -values > 0.05 (marked as “ns”), significant for p -values < 0.05 (marked as *), highly significant for p -values < 0.01 (marked as **), and extremely significant for p -values < 0.001 (marked as ***), and p -values < 0.0001 (marked as ****), respectively. 3.
These changes were highly significant (p < 0.001), reflecting greater transparency in clinical reasoning after the intervention.
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed that the effects of neck, as shown in Table 11 , trunk and knee were all highly significant, P < 0.001.
There were highly significant correlations between total and HMW adiponectin levels at baseline (r = 0.95; p < 0.001) and also at 6 months (r = 0.95; p < 0.001).
The chi-square result shows that the likelihood ratio statistics are highly significant ( p < 0.001), suggesting that the regression model has a strong explanatory power.
Correlation of items within factors was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for both meteorism and flatulence (correlation coefficient 0.46) as well as for pain and nausea (0.53), hence convergent validity was supported.
Statistical significance (p<0.05) is indicated by a single asterisks or double asterisks if highly significant (p<0.001).
Using data for 159 districts, we found that the association between dry season and wet season incidence was also highly significant (p < 0.001) overall ( Figure 7 , panel B) and stratified by province or year (not shown), although the proportion of the total variation in epidemic magnitude accounted for by dry season incidence was lower (45%).
Similarly, the percentage of perfused small vessels was markedly higher in the preserved microcirculation group (89.1 ± 5.5%) compared to the impaired microcirculation group (71.4 ± 15.9%), with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).
FAI, IOTN-DHC and IOTN-AC scores showed highly significant correlation with PIDAQ scores, depicting strong convergent validity ( p < 0.001).
There were extremely significant differences in the rate of weight loss in other groups compared to the control group ( p < 0.001).
As observed in Figure 4B , there was a highly significant ( p < 0.001) improvement in skin elasticity (21.54%) and firmness (27.18%) after using the supplement for 12 weeks.
This difference was highly significant ( p < 0.001, binomial test) and indicated that HAT-PCR was more sensitive than flow.
The Sample factor had a highly significant effect on the dependent variable (F(6,126) = 352.97, p < 0.001), indicating that different samples influenced the results to a significant extent.
The following correlations were highly significant: IPDE paranoid and attachment (0.443, p< 0.001), cognitive (0.359, p< 0.001), dominance (0.381, p< 0.001), emotional (0.398, p< 0.001), and total (0.386, p< 0.001); IPDE antisocial and behavioural (0.42, p< 0.001), cognitive (0.377, p< 0.001), dominance (0.354, p< 0.001), emotional (0.348, p< 0.001
For each model, all the factor loadings were highly significant and larger than 0.65 ( p < 0.001; Table 2 ), indicating good convergent validity of the measurement ( Cole, 1987 ).
Spatial acquisition was examined during five days of training and revealed highly significant differences between the groups with regard to escape latency ( p <0.001, Figure 4F ), indicating that neo -excised SNAP-25b deficient mice were impaired in their ability to acquire the spatial learning task compared to WT controls.
Overall, the treatment response among patients with OC was highly significant ( P < 0.001).
ARE analysis showed that in the brain, the NE@C6 group had higher ARE values than the C6 group at all time points except 10 min, with a highly significant difference at 30 min ( p < 0.001; Figure 4 B).
Highly significant ( p < 0.001) differences were found among hybrids for grain yield and other traits.
Test–retest reliability on a block to block basis was highly significant [blocks 1–2 and 1–3 correlations: Vis12: R 2 > 0.397, t (29) > 4.37, p < 10 −3 ; Aud12: R 2 > 0.357, t (29) > 4.01, p < 10 −3 ; Vis2: R 2 > 0.201, t (29) > 2.7, p < 0.02; Aud2: R 2 > 0.239, t > 3, p < 0.01].
In contrast, Ki-67 LI revealed highly significant intergroup variation (p=0.001).