Regarding the association between intentions towards COVID 19 vaccination and attitudes towards vaccines, vaccine hesitancy had highly significant associations with intermediate mistrust level of vaccine benefit (p < .001), high worries about unforeseen effects (p < .001), intermediate concerns about commercial profiteering (p < .001), and intermediate preference of natural immunity (p < .001) ( Table 5 ).
Excerpts
The highly significant ( p < 0.001) Mc-Nemar’s test is strong evidence that the proportion of positive samples detected by the two tests are different which is an indication of potential bias of the rapid test.
Fisher's exact test indicated a highly significant difference in the distribution of bacterial isolates between diseased and healthy tomato fruits ( p < 0.001), demonstrating complete ecological niche separation with no shared species between fruit health states (0% overlap).
The significance level was defined as follows: p ≥ 0.05 not significant, p < 0.05 significant, p < 0.01 highly significant, p < 0.001 highly significant.
Correlation between depression and anxiety at 3 months post-stroke Figure S1 (supplementary material) shows the linear relationship between PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scores at the 3-month follow-up, with a strong and highly significant correlation between symptoms of depression and anxiety ( r = 0.75, p < 0.001).
8b ) showing mean fluorescence intensities from tumours treated with F9 to be highly significant compared to animals treated with F3 ( p < 0.001) which confirms high tumour accumulation of F9.
For ambition in play, there was a highly significant increase in the odds for “high” (OR = 13.45, 95% CI: 5.41–33.42, p < 0.001), while “very high” showed no difference from the reference (OR = 0.98, p = 0.952).
After both S and E had been completed, absolute strength remained significantly reduced in men, while only a statistical trend was observed in women (−19±9%, p<0.001 and −12±12% p = 0.074, respectively.
1D to a logistic Binomial regression model showed a highly significant effect of hpi (χ 2 = 132.964, 2 d.f., P < 0.001), mostly driven by the very low infectivity observed 36 hpi.
The log‐rank test indicated a highly significant difference between the two cohorts ( p < 0.001), with a chi‐square (χ 2 ) value of 56.737.
The analysis of fixed effects revealed that the overall model was highly significant (F(92,36) = 2.758, p < 0.001), indicating that the predictor variables explained a significant portion of the variation in specimen abundance.
aeruginosa were pooled, highly significant mutual inhibition of biofilm formation was noted ( Candida P < 0.001, P. aeruginosa P < 0.01).
Highly significant association were found between education and CIN (X 2 = 63.694; df=1; p<0.001), age of marriage and CIN (X 2 = 24.023; df=1; p<0.001) and parity and CIN (X 2 = 20.338; df=1; p<0.001).
Statistically highly significant differences are observed in UIBC and TIBC across all trimester comparisons (p<0.001), highlighting dynamic changes in iron-binding capacities.
Statistical analysis revealed a highly significant interaction term and main effect of frequency ( P < 0.001) and a marginally significant overall effect of groups ( P = 0.05).
However, at 28 d, a highly significant reduction in the rate of body weight gain was observed in the CUMS model group compared to the CON group ( p < 0.001).
All these effects were highly significant ( P = .001).
In Penno et al.’s study, subjects with eGDR < 4.14 had a hypertension prevalence of 99.5%, subjects with eGDR value between 4.15 and 5.34 also had a hypertension prevalence of 98.7%, and subjects with eGDR ≥ 5.34 had a hypertension prevalence of 52.8% [ 11 ]; In their work, they also used euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp test to exam the correlation between eGDR and the level of measured glucose disposal rate, the results demonstrated that the correlation of eGDR with measured glucose disposal rate was highly significant (r = 0.624, P < 0.001).
The mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) initially was 3.13 (± 2.68) but after 6 months, it decreased to 3.06 (± 2.68) and this change was found to be statistically highly significant (p<0.001).
It reduced significantly to the range of 1–15 g with mean being 9.79 ± 9.40 g after treatment ( P = 0.001, highly significant).
Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity was highly significant (p < .001) and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy (KM0=0.810) value supported the factorability of the matrix ( 21 ).
After 48 h, it is possible to observe an increasing trend in the proportion of cells with Annexin V-FITC (39.4%, p < 0.001) and double staining (35.7%, p < 0.001) when compared to 24 h of incubation ( Figure 6 B,C).
There was highly significant spatial variation in the incidence of P. falciparum ( Table 3 , any density: Χ 2 = 32.5, df = 10, p<0.001 Pf >2500: Χ 2 = 35.2, df = 5, p<0.001) and P. vivax ( Table 4 , any density: Χ 2 = 47.5, df = 10, p<0.001, Pv >500: Χ 2 = 56.5, df = 10, p<0.001) but not P. malariae episodes (any density: Χ 2 = 7.4.0, df = 10, p = 0.69).
As shown in Figure 3 A, reduction in the cell migration of GPE-treated DU145 cells was highly significant ( p < 0.001) in a dose-dependent manner, compared to control vehicle-treated cells.
A highly significant correlation ( p ≤ 0.001) was observed between SOD and POD (positive).