Excerpts

By contrast, BIOF2 application caused increased articular thickness from day 14 of treatment, with a highly significant difference at day 28, compared with the saline solution group (P<0.01; Fig. 2A ).

Although, the main effect of group [ F (1,47) = 3.35; p = 0.074] and the interaction between time and group [ F (2,94) = 1.76; p = 0.178] failed to reach significance, separate post hoc analysis showed a significant increase regarding confidence only in the BS group from T1 to T3 ( p < 0.01).

Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 and highly significant differences at p < 0.01.

A three-factorial ANOVA with PL, RL, and OTL as between-subject factors revealed a highly significant main effect of RL, F (1,111) = 37.4, p < 0.01, MSe = 0.09, η 2 = 0.25 ( M = 0.95 for low RL and M = 0.61 for high RL), a significant main effect of OTL, F (1,111) = 8.17, p < 0.01, MSe = 0.09, η 2 = 0.07 ( M = 0.86 for low OTL and M = 0.70 for high OTL) and a significant interaction between RL and OTL, F (1,111) = 8.25, p < 0.01, MSe = 0.09, η 2 = 0.07.

Notably, the inhibitory effect of 4 mM butyric acid was highly significant ( P < 0.01).

There was a highly significant difference ( P < 0.01) between the irradiated and control units after the first week of storage in both types of PRBCs.

At the DNA level, divergence between the 3 species was highly significant (P < 0.01) with Fst estimates above 0.92 across the whole gene.

Parameters of mature pods According to the ANOVA analysis, the foliar spray treatments and Mg levels were highly significant ( P < 0.01) for the mature pods'parameters (number of green pods per plant, the weight of dry pods, and the weight of green pods per plant) (Table 4 ).

Remarkably, there is a highly significant ( p <0.01) increase in the frequency of larger foci with age ( Figure 6D , right).

In this work, an isotig was considered differentially expressed when it exhibited highly significant difference in read abundance at P < 0.01.

MTR was the measure most sensitive to demographic factors, the negative correlation with age being highly significant ( p < 0.01) for both overall means, and many individual muscles.

Differences are considered non-significant (NS) when p ≥ 0.05, significant (*) when p<0.05, and highly significant (**) when p<0.01.

The regression model was highly significant ( P < 0.01), and the lack of fit was not significant ( P > 0.05), indicating that the model was significant and had a good fit.

Statistical differences were interpreted as significant at P<0.05 , highly significant at P<0.01 and not significant at P>0.05.

The ranking comparison between nestedness and pattern of species distribution was also highly significant (Spearman’s rank coefficient test: r s = 0.889, p < 0.01).

Solar radiation of MERRA showed a positive trend of 3.36 MJ m −2 yr −1 (p<0.01), which is consistent with that of observed sunshine hours ( Figure 2B ).

The PI values between the groups also showed highly significant improvement only in Group IIA, wherein the PI values decreased from baseline (0.6667) to 12 weeks (0.3333) (p < 0.01) (Table 1 ).

A test of the trends in residuals against a null hypothesis of a distribution about a mean of zero indicates highly significant negative trends in the two cloudy sectors ( P <0.01), significant negative trends in the clear-warm sector ( P =0.03), and no trend in the clear-cold sector.

In contrast, both doses of fusion protein caused highly significant effects on survival ( p < 0.01).

And a highly significant (Figure 1 B, P < 0.01) reduction of miR-34a in 12 of 14 MIBC tissues was observed.

Two species with more than 5 distribution sites had significant positive correlations with altitude, and distance between population and road ( P <0.05), but had extremely significant negative correlations with agricultural activities ( P <0.01) ( Table 2 ).

Statistical Analysis Traits were expressed as the mean ± standard error of three independent biological replicates and subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan’s Multiple Range post-hoc testing and Student t- test (SPSS 17, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY); the highly significant and, marginally significant levels were set to P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively.

Except for the initial sampling on day -12, the differences in GSH-Px activity between the STG and CON groups were highly significant ( p < 0.01) at all subsequent measurement points ( Figure 1 A). 2.3.

Both soils are alkaline soils [ 33 ], with mean pH values ranging from 8.21 to 8.29, and the pH level of arable soils is significantly higher than that of saline soils ( p < 0.01); the mean values of the TS content of the two types showed a highly significant difference ( p < 0.01), with the TS content of the OY group being (0.58 ± 0.04) g/kg, which is a mildly saline soil; from the nutrient results, it can be seen that AP, AK, TN, and SOM had the same trend, all of which showed that their contents were significantly higher in arable soils than in saline soils ( p < 0.01). 3.1.2.

The difference in the thicknesses of the small airway wall was markedly significant between the controls (7.6±1.1 μm 2 /μm) and the WS group (14.3±3.3 μm 2 /μm, p<0.01) or the CS group (12.1±3.4 μm 2 /μm, p<0.01) ( Figure 2h ).