Statistical significance, assessed with the cor.test() function (based on the Fisher transformation), confirmed that all correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Excerpts
The medium and large farm size dummy was positive and highly significant ( P < 0.001) with ownership, indicating influence on ownership of all three machines investigated.
In the presence of known predictors of 30-day mortality, mean sentiment polarity was a highly significant predictor in a multiple logistic regression model (Adjusted OR = 0.4626, p < 0.001, 95% CI: [0.4244, 0.5041]) and led to improved predictive accuracy (AUROC = 0.8189 versus 0.8092, 95% BCI of difference: [0.0070, 0.0126]).
The levels of IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, and TNF-α were improved by administration of the drug, and the best results were achieved in the HD group with highly significant levels ( P < 0.001).
The difference between the means was highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Highly significant correlations between the SA/JA ratio with redox status [GSH/GSSG ( P < 0.001) and NADPH/NADP + ( P < 0.01) ratios] and the expression of phenylpropanoid synthesis-related genes [ CHS ( P < 0.01), ANR ( P < 0.001), and F5H ( P < 0.01)] were observed ( Table 2 ).
The dependence on time was significantly better represented by the quadratic model than a linear growth model [ χ 2 (1) 9.858, p < 0.05], and inclusion of the intact measure was highly significant in improving the model [ χ 2 (5) 21.213, p < 0.001].
In these zones, the decrease in cropping area is highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The regression coefficient was positive and highly significant ( b ∗ = 0.986, p < 0.001; R 2 = 0.973, p < 0.001).
Again a highly significant main effect of Target-Valence confirmed that positive pictures were rated as more arousing than neutral ones ( F 1;67 = 145.78, p < .001; control group: t 33 = -9.72, p < .001; depletion group: t 34 = -7.26, p < .001).
Moreover, even though all three experiments were carried out under the same greenhouse conditions, ANOVAs showed highly significant differences ( p < 0.001) between the replications.
The expression difference peaked at 24 h, with IS1219 showing a highly significant upregulation ( P < 0.001) relative to RTx430.
Finally, the visual model confirmed that the degradation mode had a highly significant impact on both metrics ( p < 0.001), with reading ability also serving as a significant predictor for peak activation ( p < 0.001) and cluster size ( p = 0.008).
The effect of age on GM volume in this sample was highly significant ( β = −0.501, P < 0.001, Figure 5(a) ).
The level of significance was defined as follows: p > 0.05, no significant difference; * p < 0.05, significant difference; ** p < 0.01, highly significant difference; and *** p < 0.001, highly significant difference [ 7 ]. 2.9.
There were highly significant intra-observer correlations of both diaphragms in the all patients ( r = 0.93, p < 0.001 for right diaphragm; r = 0.92, p < 0.001 for left diaphragm).
Both the results for V V and N V show statistically highly significant differences as confirmed by two-sample T tests (both p < 0.001).
Thus, increases in mean numbers of late adolescent risk behaviours were greater among girls (0.75 vs 1.56; age and social class adjusted p<0.001) than boys (1.50 vs 1.93; adjusted p=0.048); the cohort-by-gender interaction was highly significant (adjusted p<0.001) (web table 1).
However, the time effect was highly significant ( F = 123.63, p < 0.001), showing a marked reduction in airflow over time.
A highly significant drop occurred after 60 days, with PLT levels falling to 1.94 ± 0.032 ( p < 0.001), confirming the deleterious effects of chronic Cd toxicity on thrombopoiesis.
The Mann-Whitney U -test revealed a highly significant ( p < 0.001) hypomethylation of the BEGAIN promoter in autistic individuals.
The difference between the mean blood pressures of the groups in Tables V and VI was highly significant (P < 0.001).
All items and indexes had highly significant downward trends ( P < 0.001).
Incubation with the substrate led to a larger drop in caecal reaction than incubation of control samples for both species, as demonstrated by highly significant differences ( P <0.001; Table 2 ).
In contrast to the decreases in hepatic glycogen content effected by the administration of bacterial endotoxin in well nourished rats, the injection of the same quantity and lot of endotoxin into fasted rats resulted in a highly significant increase in mean hepatic glycogen content from 1.0 mg. per gin. of wet liver to 3.0 mg. per gm. of wet liver (P < 0.001).