Statistical significance of shape variation The pairwise Mahalanobis distances based on shape, for both landmark- and outline-based shapes, were highly significant ( p < 0.001) between Fasciola intermediate forms and F . gigantica or F . hepatica .
Excerpts
The results, shown in Table 7 , reveal a decreasing trend in BP across all three dietary changes, with a significant correlation between the changes and the decrease in BP ( P < 0.001).
In the left hemisphere, the DTI-ALPS index showed a positive trend with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score (r=0.397, P<0.001).
At 36 months, significant and borderline significant declines in qHBsAg, respectively, were noted in the group A (p<0.001) and in group B (p = 0.068) patients ( Fig 2B ).
In contrast, analysis of US specimens yielded a highly significant result ( r statistic = 0.515, p = 0.001).
napus seeds show a highly significant negative correlation ( r = −0.22, P < 0.001) in the natural population (Figure S6 ).
The Kaiser–Meyer-Olkin measure of sampling adequacy was 0.889, and Bartlett’s test of sphericity was highly significant ( p < 0.001), thus a principal component analysis (PCA) model was deemed appropriate.
A p < 0.05 indicated significant (*), p < 0.01 indicated highly significant (**), and p < 0.001 indicated extremely highly significant (***) difference. 3.
All of the associations were highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The differences in OTT were highly significant (p < 0.001) between all groups (one-way ANOVA) and between any pairs of groups.
This difference between species was highly significant along PC2 (10% of variation; F 1,127 = 131.1, p < 0.001) and suggests a general trend of expansion of both the proximal and distal area of the MFB in H. melpomene Postman phenotypes compared to H. erato .
Results were considered as not significant (ns) when P >0.05, very significant when P =0.01< P <0.05 (*) and extremely significant when P <0.001 (**).
The mean orientation difference, 14.7 ± 5.53° (mean ± standard error across participants), was highly significant, t(49) = –18.92, p < 0.001, lgBF = 21.0.
According to the perMANOVA results ( Table 3 ), temperature had the strongest effect on the PC scores, explaining 47.9% of the total variance (R2 = 0.479), showing in parallel highly significant results ( p < 0.001).
General linear analysis shows a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001) between the normal gravity and simulated microgravity populations when the 0-time point is omitted indicating that adaptation of this phenotype is specific to the environment.
This difference was significant as early as 24 h after inoculation ( p < 0.01, Wilcoxon test), and highly significant after 30 h of incubation ( p < 0.001, Wilcoxon test).
The expression level of one gene, oxysterol binding protein-like 11 (OSBPL11), was revealed to be lower in HCC tissues compared with adjacent tissues in all 10 samples; this difference was identified to be significant in nine of the samples, and the difference between the HCT and AT groups reached a highly significant level (P<0.001; Table SIII ).
When we correlated the phospholipase and proteinase activity of a total of 29 Candida isolates belonging to the different species, which produced these hydrolases, a highly significant positive correlation between the production of the two extracellular enzymes was noted (r = 0.818; p < 0.001; Figure 5 ).
Results The univariate LME showed highly significant differences between previously malnourished and control groups ( p < 0.001); age ( p = 0.01) was also significant, with no interaction between group and age detected.
Specifically, a highly significant interaction was observed between irrational beliefs and health anxiety scores with family history of diabetes on 10-year T2DM risk ( p < 0.001).
The overall effect was positive and highly significant, indicating that HITS improved episodic memory (Hedges’ g =0.44; 95% CI [0.34, 0.54]; p <0.001; Figure 2A ).
Chi-square tests revealed highly significant differences in these comparisons, X 2 ( df = 1 ) Lo/Ore-R = 211.93; p<<0.001) and ( X 2 ( df = 1 ) Hi5/Ore-R = 236.49: p<<0.001.
We found highly significant differences ( P ≤ 0.001) among the MDL lines for both traits.
Temperature (tm) had a highly significant positive effect on the number of red deer ( P < 0.001, Coef = 10.25, T = 13.89), indicating that a 1 °C increase in temperature was associated with an increase of approximately 10.25 individuals.
All differences between l parameters in the three reward magnitudes in cognitive effort conditions were highly significant ( p < .001 in all cases).