Barely Significant
← all phrases

“an increasing trend”

63,972 sentences · 63,972 papers · 107,686 search hits before verification · confirmed specimen

Sighted at

p<0.09

Listed by Hankins (2013) · Otte et al. (2022)

In the literature

an increasing trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Results For the index scores of the two groups, the results of repeated-measures ANOVA indicated an increasing trend at three time points, i.e., after 2 weeks of treatment, 4 weeks after treatment, and 3 months after the end of treatment ( p < 0.001); in terms of intergroup effects, there was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in WAB naming scores ( F = 4.865, p = 0.042); and the aphasia quotient (AQ), listening comprehension, and naming scores of the two groups had interactive effects ( F AQ = 11.316, P AQ = 0.000; F listening = 8.205, P listening = 0.002; F naming = 27.46, P naming = 0.000).
an increasing trendp < 0.0010.0× alphagold
Comorbidity Phenotype Trends Comorbidity phenotype trends were directionally consistent with the NE–PSY divergence: cerebrovascular and motor deficit phenotypes showed an increasing trend ( p < 0.001), neurodegenerative increased ( p = 0.001), psychiatric primary decreased ( p = 0.014), and behavioral showed no statistically significant variation ( p = 0.82) ( Figure 6 ). 3.5.2.
an increasing trendp values < 0.0010.0× alphagold
The number of migrants referred to CCDDs and undergoing a neuropsychological assessment, the proportion of services that received at least one migrant in 2019, and the percentage of facilities that registered an increasing trend in the number of migrants in recent years were higher in the Northern and Central regions relative to the South of Italy (all p values < 0.001) (Table 1 and Figure 2 ).
an increasing trendP< 0.0010.0× alphagold
After antibiotic induced intestinal flora disturbance in mice, as the abundance of g_Klebsiella, g_Parasutterella and g_Enterobacter showed an increasing trend (P< 0.001), the abundance of g_Lactobacillus in each group was greatly reduced (P< 0.001).
an increasing trendp < .0010.0× alphagold
For location effect, post-hoc analysis also showed an increasing trend of LPP from anterior to posterior direction, with significant differences from frontocentral to central sites ( F (1, 21) = 30.662, p < .001, η p 2 = .594) and from central to parietocentral to central sites ( F (1, 21) = 41.668, p < .001, η p 2 = .665), but not from parietocentral to parietal sites ( F (1, 21) = 4.932, p = ns) after collapsing all emotions.