“close to the limit of significance”

Between 20:00 and 04:00, there were significant differences, close to the limit of significance, only between N vs N S , H vs H D and H vs H O .

On the other hand, although the derivative presents p values close to the limit of significance, the thickness does not present a significant difference in deformation, with the direction of impression being the most important criterion for both mechanical and physical–chemical behaviours. 4.

However, the association between values of this biomarker reflecting light-to-moderate wine consumption and CVD in women was close to the limit of significance.

Because the difference in IFNγ-mediated T cell responses was close to the limit of significance, statistical significance would be likely to be lost if correction for multiple comparisons were to be applied.

Only 7 comparisons presented p-values close to the limit of significance (between 0.050 and 0.070).

However, when we compared those with MH with respect to the presence of symptoms, the p -value was close to the limit of significance, but not significant ( p = 0.051) ( Table IV ).