Differences with controls were considered statistically significant at an alpha value of P < 0.05, and extremely significant at P < 0.01.
← all phrases
“extremely significant”
In the literature
The PC chicken demonstrated an extremely significant difference in both hormones’ expression levels ( P < 0.01 and P < 0.001), especially in the peak-laying period ( Figures 2 B and 2 C).
Similar to that seen in the ERG11 gene, the relative ABC2 gene expression was extremely significantly upregulated in four itraconazole-resistant isolates ( p < 0.01) and significant in one itraconazole-resistant isolate ( p < 0.05), as compared with the reference strain ATCC 6258, whereas only two itraconazole-susceptible dose-dependent isolates showed an extremely significant upregulation of ABC2 gene expression compared to the reference strain ATCC 6258 ( p < 0.01, Figure 3A ).
Furthermore, we found extremely significant correlations between ten bacteria and eleven DEGs ( p < 0.01, Figure 8 C), among which four belonged to Proteobacteria, including Plesiomonas , Arenimonas , Erythrobacter and Aquabacterium .
Soil pH and carbon cycling nutrients exhibited an extremely significant positive correlation with soil multifunctionality ( P < 0.01).
All the 7 linked markers in two QTL in the LGs A2 (OW-A2 and OQ-A2) and C9 (OY-C9 and OQ-C9) had significant (P<0.05) or extremely significant (P<0.01) difference except GSSR161 in OQ-A2 and SF24724 in OY-C9 and OQ-C9.
We then identified modules that were extremely significant ( p -value < 0.01) positively or negatively correlated with particular traits (stresses) by calculating module-trait spearman correlation coefficients using the module_trait_cor function from BioNERO.
The difference was considered to be significant when p was <0.05, and the difference was considered to be extremely significant when p was <0.01 ( ## p < 0.01 is vs. the control group; * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 are vs. model group).
Differences were deemed significant (*) at P < 0.05 and extremely significant (**) at P < 0.01.
The three types of high-temperature Daqu had an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) in flavor: white high-temperature Daqu was characterized by sourness, bitterness, astringency, richness, methane, alcohols, ketones, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur organic compounds; black high-temperature Daqu was characterized by aftertaste-A, aftertaste-B, methane-aliph, hydrogen, and aromatic compounds; and yellow high-temperature Daqu was characterized by saltiness, umami, methane, alcohols, ketones, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur organic compounds.
Additionally, due to no fat deposition in FB stage, adipose tissues were observed in calf stage and AC stage, and the results revealed that mRNA expression levels of CFL2 gene have an extremely significant increase in adult bovine compared to that of the calf ( p < 0.01).
Among them, norank_f__ norank_o__norank_c__Alphaproteobacteria and norank_f __Euzebyaceae showed extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01) in the relative abundance among all samples.
In present experiment, the difference in egg production between GP and DP was extremely significant ( P < 0.01), with an average of 100 eggs in GP (94–112) and 30 eggs in DP (2–50).
However, when difference between Groups 1 and 3 and Groups 2 and 3 were compared, the difference was statistically significantly for VAS 0 (p>0.05) and extremely significant for other VAS time frames (p<0.01).
Differences were considered statistically significant at a P value of <0.05 and extremely significant at a P value of < 0.01 or < 0.001.
[ 42 ] reported that N and P fertilizers had extremely significant ( P < 0.01) effects on the 100-seed weight of mung bean.
2 ). SAM/SRMS muscle strength indices The generalized SAM/SRMS form QeQc indices showed marked increase in the ACLD limb at 30°–60° knee angle, extremely significant for SRMS-QeQc at 40° and 50°( P < 0.01, d ≥ 0.892).
Significance levels were indicated as follows: ns, not significant ( p ≥ 0.05); *, statistically significant difference ( p < 0.05); **, statistically extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01).
Correlation Analysis Between Nutrient Contents and Stoichiometric Characteristics of Different Components of Main Shrubs and Herbs in Karst Forests As shown in Figure 5 , for the stoichiometric characteristics of shrub leaves, the positive correlation groups were as follows: C content was significantly ( p < 0.05) positively correlated with C/K (r = 0.54); there were significant ( p < 0.05) or extremely significant ( p < 0.01) positive correlations between N content and P (r = 0.68), Ca (r = 0.62), and Mg (r = 0.60) contents, as well as between P content and Ca (r = 0.67) and Mg (r = 0.46) contents; K content was extremely significantly ( p < 0.01) positively correlated with K/P (r = 0.73); Ca content was significantly ( p < 0.05) or extremely significantly ( p < 0.01) positively correlated with Mg (r = 0.79), N/K (r = 0.61), and Ca/Mg (r = 0.47).
There were extremely significant differences ( p < 0.01) in the granule size distribution of the three corn flours ( Table 1 ).
Results showed that coniferous forests had the lowest species diversity (0.86), which exhibited extremely significant differences from broad-leaved forests (1.47, p < 0.01) and coniferous broad-leaved mixed forests (1.58, p < 0.01).
Furthermore, nitrogen-fixing ability exhibited an extremely significant ( p < 0.01) and positive correlation with NRT (r = 0.778), SD (r = 0.744) and SDW (r = 0.657).
Temperature exhibited an extremely significant effect (F = 60.22, p < 0.01), while reaction time and water/castor oil ratio were not statistically significant within the investigated ranges, consistent with the range analysis.
Permanova analysis of clone groups (including clone 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) based on SNP distance showed that there were extremely significant differences among different clone groups (P < 0.01), which indicated that the classification is correct.
In 1982–2015, T min of the Yellow River Basin showed a significant increasing trend ( p < 0.05), of which about 99.5% showed an extremely significant increasing trend ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 3 b).