“extremely significant”

As shown in Figure 3 A,B, compared with the control group, the expression of ovarian FSHR in the Mel group was significantly increased ( p < 0.05), extremely significant increase in FSH group and FSH+Mel group ( p < 0.01) ( Figure 3 A,B).

The circles in the figure represented the GO classification in which the differential proteins are located, with red representing extremely significant DEPs ( p value ≤ 0.01), yellow representing significant differential proteins ( p value ≤ 0.05), and blue representing non-significant enrichment.

The interaction between altitude and rhizosphere effect showed extremely significant effects on SOC, TN, TP, HN, AK, C:K, N:K and p :K ( p < 0.01) and a significant effect on AP ( p < 0.05) ( Table 2 ). 3.2.

Accurate root cutting rate The results of the variance analysis for the accurate root cutting rate are shown in Table 5 , and the experimental model is extremely significant ( p < 0.01).

Differences were considered statistically significant at P <0.05, and extremely significant at P <0.01.

In RStudio, the t -test was used to check whether there was a significant difference (significant: p < 0.05; extremely significant: p < 0.01) [ 29 ].

7 ), the Pielou index, Shannon index and Simpson index had extremely significant negative relationships with the leaf C:P and N:P ratios ( P < 0.01), while the relationships among the other indicators were not significant ( P > 0.05).

It can be seen from Table S2 that the p value (0.0001) of the model is extremely significant ( p < 0.01), the determination coefficient (R 2 = 0.9913) and the adjusted determination coefficient (R 2 adj = 0.9802) are quite close, indicating that the regression model is well fitted.

Furthermore, we found some SNPs have an association with the risk of GC at the extremely significant difference level P < 0.01, such as minor allele “A” of rs11125529, minor allele of “A” of rs12615793 and minor allele “T” of rs843711.

P -values of p < 0.0001 and p < 0.001 were considered extremely significant (**** or ***), p < 0.01 very significant (**) and p < 0.05 significant (*).

Especially, there were extremely significant correlations ( P < 0.01) between TKW and KL or KW in three environments, and the correlation coefficients ranged from 0.38 to 0.76 (Table 2 ).

The results showed that in pre-hierarchical and hierarchical stages, GC lipid deposition had an extremely significant ( P <0.01) correlation with time in culture ( Figure 3 A,B,D), while at 96 h, the lipid deposition in GCs in hierarchical co-culture was significantly ( P <0.01) higher than it was in mono-culture.

Second, according to the Pearson correlation analysis, both Pmass and Parea had extremely significant positive correlations with LA ( p < 0.01), indicating that LA was greatly affected by the phosphorus content in leaves.

Furthermore, when the concentration of these six compounds was 160 μM, the NO concentrations decreased significantly in comparison to the LPS group, with an extremely significant difference ( p < 0.01) [ 39 ]. 2.6.3.

ANOVA demonstrated that the ethanol concentration and extraction temperature had an extremely significant effect on the PEIL extraction yield ( p < 0.01; p < 0.05).

** indicates extremely significant differences determined using the Student’s t-test ( p < 0.01).

The experimental results showed that the linear coefficient of the water content ( X 1 ) and extraction temperature ( X 3 ) were extremely significant ( p < 0.01), whereas the extraction time ( X 4 ) was considerable ( p < 0.05).

The results showed that the DEGs accumulated in the “phenylpropanoid biosynthesis” pathway exhibited extremely significant differences in both KR and MR under Al stress ( p < .01), which indicated that phenylpropanoid biosynthesis may play a role in tolerance to Al stress ( Figures 6C,D ).

Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

The comparative analysis of the CAT activity between the resistant and susceptible lines showed the extremely significant difference ( P < 0.01) at all the time points and the differences in the CAT activity between the resistant and susceptible rice lines were bigger during early SBPH infestation.

Interestingly, the PCV2-positive rate was significantly higher in the PPV7-positive samples than in the non-PPV7 samples, and the difference was extremely significant (P<0.01).

ABTS and the reducing power showed extremely significant positive correlations ( p < 0.01) with the TPC, TFC, total acid, and volatile acid.

The results from the molecular variance analysis (AMOVA) showed that there was an extremely significant genetic variation observed among the populations ( P < 0.01), which contained 63.57% of the total variation.

5 of them had significant differences ( P < 0.05), and 26 had extremely significant differences ( P < 0.01). 3.3.

For the IM and FM groups, the difference was extremely significant ( P < 0.01) for the ACE and Chao 1 indexes, but not significant for the Simpson and Shannon indexes.