ToM and NP variable As shown in Table 1 , the findings in this study indicated that PtTBI performed poorly than in the HC group on the entire ToM tasks, that is, both verbal and nonverbal task and cognitive and affective task, as the mean difference between groups was highly significant ( P < .001).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
All correlations were highly significant ( p < 0.001, Bonferroni-adjusted α = 0.0018) and in the expected direction thereby confirming our assumptions: While COM was strongly positively associated with ESC, BDI was strongly negatively related to both, COM as well as ESC, before and after treatment.
A highly significant difference between the three vertical skull configurations regarding median palatal height was found in the first three measured layers ( p < 0.001).
With the addition of PL, the ternary SDs showed highly significant (***, p < 0.001) changes in the SL release profile ( Fig. 3 ).
This indicates that pretest and post-tests within Group A and Group B on asthma patients show a highly significant difference in mean values at P ≤ 0.001 (Table 1 and Table 2 ).
Moderate genetic differentiation was shown among the populations, with highly significant ( p < 0.001) fixation indices (F ST , F IS and F IT ).
With respect to the Swiss Emergency Triage Scale, we found a highly significant association between the two groups and the triage groups (life-threatening: adolescents 148 (3%) vs. adults 15,564 (7.8%), p < 0.001).
There were highly significant differences in the severity of disease among sepsis groups on admission as determined by PRISM, P-MODS, and DIC scores ( p < 0.001) ( Table 2 ). 3.3.
Multi-site variety trials with six contrasting spring wheat varieties carried out on organic farms located in three contrasting pedo-climatic zones of the UK also identified very highly significant ( p < 0.001) interactions between site/environment and variety for (i) grain and protein yield, (ii) major yield-determining parameters such as Septoria and yellow rust severity and (iii) processing and nutritional quality parameters [ 57 ] ( Table 6 , Table 7 and Table 8 ).
The criterion for significance was set as p < 0.05, and highly significant differences in the statistics were accepted if p < 0.001.
Results Analysis of variance The combined analysis of variance (Table 2 ) showed that genotype (GEN) and environment (ENV) had a highly significant (p < 0.001) effect on all the studied traits, whereas the effect of genotype was significant on all the studied traits except for CT.
30 Before the availability of ACPA testing, a seminal study of over 2000 healthy INA monitored biannually for up to 19 years revealed a highly significant association between RF level and RA development (p<0.001, controlling for age and sex). 60 Genotype also confers additional risk of ACPA and RA in FDRs of INA populations.
Plasma sLOX-1 levels showed a strong discrimination among healthy and NSTMI patients (AUC 0.916) ( Figure-3A ) and also between healthy subjects with STEMI patients (AUC 0.925) ( Figure-3B ) and they were statistically highly significant (p<0.001).
Table 4 shows that a highly significant negative correlation was found between participants' age and their PHQ-9 scores (r = -0.52, p < 0.001) and their self-esteem scores (r = 0.34, p < 0.001).
The highly significant (p < 0.001) result of Bartlett’s test indicates a relationship between the variables of the GEDRISK scale, demonstrating its effectiveness in identifying the subdimensions of the preliminary scale [ 43 ].
An ANOVA with discipline as a factor produced a highly significant difference, F (10, 6.442) = 11.31, p < .001, η 2 = 0.02.
The CCLAD unadjusted RR is not significant with a high p-value (0.996), upon adjustment this turns highly significant (p<0.001) which is not impossible but rather unusual.
Smear and Culture conversion at the end of 2 months was highly significant as a predictor (p<0.001).
In the AIPE-confirmed PE group, and according to the AIPE severity classification, the differences in IELT-a and IELT-p between the severity groups were highly significant, with the duration of both IELT-a and ILET-p being higher in AIPE-No-PE and mild-PE groups ( P < 0.001 for both).
The lowest values of index tests, the ROMA and SRR, were found in women with benign masses, with the differences between this group and both borderline and early stage malignancies being highly significant ( p < 0.001).
Moreover, there was a highly significant association between the PPD and having one of the mental health disorder in the last pregnancy ( P < 0·001), 12·7 % of the mothers in the cases group were suffering from major depression during the last pregnancy, 22·0 % were suffering from eating disorders and 23·3 % were suffering from either anxiety, insomnia or panic.
Although all these paths were highly significant (P<0.001), the effect sizes were not impressive.
On the other hand, a subgroup analysis including those patients who had available determinations of hs-TnI and NT-proBNP during the study period, showed a moderate but highly significant positive correlation between both biomarker concentrations (correlation coefficient 0.591, p < 0.001, supplementary Fig. 2 ).
A one-sided t-test to determine whether the difference between the predicted and actual chronological age was less than 2.0 years was statistically highly significant ( p < 0.001).
The revealed highly significant P < 0.001 for all within-group comparisons, including total QOL, mental health, and self-esteem from baseline to intermediate time points, and from baseline to the final time point.