“highly significant”

Moreover, participants with asthma demonstrated a higher prevalence of COPD, emphysema, or chronic bronchitis (COPD, Emphysema, ChB) (31.1%) than their counterparts without asthma (6.8%), with a highly significant p-value (p < 0.001) (Table 1 ).

* represents P < 0.05 (significant), ** represents P < 0.01 (highly significant), and *** represents P < 0.001 (very highly significant).

The intragroup comparison of the CFU/mL count showed a highly significant reduction from baseline to post-intervention for both the groups ( p = 0.001).

Quality performance indicators could clearly show a highly significant improvement > 150 patients in SI (≤ 150: 0.38 ± 0.1 to > 151 0.44 ± 0.1; p < 0.001) and LSD (≤ 150: 0.51 ± 0.2 to > 151: 0.65 ± 0.23; p < 0.001) eventually resulting in a SL/WL-ratio of 6.1 ± 2.3 (> 151–351) coming from 5.6 ± 2.5 (1–151; p < 0.001, Fig. 3 ).

Results The statistical comparison between groups I, II, III, and IV casts measurements by using the Mann–Whitney test showed highly significant statistical difference between the various groups from each other ( p < 0.001) Conclusion The accuracy of the working casts obtained from group III impression (two-step using 1 mm coping) was the best, whereas it was least with group II impression (two-step using polyethylene spacer).

Highly significant genetic variations ( p < 0.001) were observed for BSR disease incidence (DI) in all field screening tests and disease rating and area under the disease progress curve in the greenhouse.

Similarly, there was a highly significant ( P < 0.001) positive correlation between FACIT-F and physical (+0.70) and emotional scores (+0.45) of QOL.

Across all subjects there was a highly significant correlation between vessel Aβ40 density and vessel Aβ42 density (Spearman rho = 0.855, P < .001).

Most participants (82.4%) had experience of caring for a dying patient, while fewer (22.1%) had cared for a dying patient within the last month. Construct validity The KMO value of the nurse-specific EPCS-C was 0.964 and Bartlett’s test was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Results Modified VAR regression of NYC area COVID-19 caseload trends proves highly significant modelling capacity of observed patterns in longitudinal disease incidence (county R 2 range: 0.9221–0.9751, all p < 0.001).

The analyses found that there is a highly significant difference in social presence between introverts and extroverts t (44) = −3.23, p = .001 and a highly significant difference in sense of community between introverts and extroverts t (127) = −3.83, p < .001.

The level of significance was set as P-value ≤ 0.05 considered significant (*), P-value ≤ 0.01 considered highly significant (**), P-value ≤ 0.001 (***) considered highly significant, and ns considered insignificant.

Statistically, there is a highly significant association between OCD and college years ( p < 0.001); this aligns with the previous study conducted among Brazilian medical students [ 4 ]; the authors demonstrated that severe obsessive-compulsive symptoms were associated with being in the first year, having depressive symptoms and difficulty in adaptation.

Most of these associations were highly significant, with a P value of < 0.001, as shown in Table 10 .

Highly significant difference was present if P ≤0.001.

A highly significant ( P < 0.001) Moran's I -test result indicated spatial dependence.

The results were considered significant when the probability of error is less than 5% ( p < .05) and highly significant when the probability of error is less than 0.1% ( p < .001).

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that the between-population variation accounts for 41% of the total molecular variation and the genetic divergence was highly significant ( F st = 0.256; P < 0.001).

Females had a highly significant correlation between height and PEFR (r=0.532, P<0.001).

After administration of indoloquinoline analogs 6a, 6b, 6c and 6d at a dose of 100 mg/kg for 5 constitutive days to mice with EAC, the levels of lipid peroxidation were highly significant less than that of the positive control group ( p < 0.001).

When stratifying patients into two groups at six points or higher, a highly significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative seizures between the two groups was noted (Pearson Chi 2 : p < 0.001).

The difference among KRT types was highly significant (log rank chi-square 1063, p < 0.001).

The criterion for significance was set as p < 0.05, and highly significant differences in the statistics were accepted if p < 0.001.

The ANOVA test showed highly significant differences in the efficacies of various groups ( P = 0.001).

Finally, the main effect of cue type was highly significant, F (1, 82) = 79.26, p = 0.001, η p 2 = 0.49, with greater mean |IRI error | when the pacing cue was a metronome (4.0% ± 0.9) than when it was a song (0.6% ± 0.2).