“highly significant”

As demonstrated in Table 2 , there is a high and highly significant correlation between age and seniority ( p < 0.001), indicating a robust positive association.

Egger’s regression analysis confirmed the presence of bias, with a highly significant result (intercept = − 2.45, 95% CI: − 3.12—− 1.79, t = − 7.254, p < 0.001).

The comparison of the mean spirometric indices of flour mill and controls groups (mean ±SD) indicates FVC, FEV 1 , and PEFR are highly significant (P<0.001) and FEF 25 % −75 % are significant (P<0.01).

The environmental data describing air pollution resulted in different patterns where NO showed highly significant correlations with season and PM 10 with day of the week (all p values <0.001).

Breed was highly significant at all analyzed timepoints (p < 0.001).

CB's results conformed to these predictions, with a highly significant positive compatibility effect of 54 ms (t = 5.9, df = 381, p < 0.001).

We found a highly significant ( p < 0.001) Pearson correlation coefficient (.251) between water age at sample sites and THM levels.

QGSGS findings suggested that a highly significant improvement in scar severity was seen after all modalities ( P < 0.001); namely, an excellent to very good rating was found in 46.7% of the PRP group, 26.7% of the TCA CROSS group and 60% of the PRP with microneedling group.

With the only exception of CVD (no significant difference between controls and SCD), the difference in prevalence was highly significant ( p < 0.001) for all these comparisons.

Valuable information was obtained suggesting that MEAN, SD, %AREA, COMP, Skewness, IDM and Contrast had highly significant differences when related to the Fibrosis Stage (FS) (p<0,001) and ASM had significant differences (p<0,05).

Comparison between Group I and III showed a highly significant difference of bone resorption in ridge width at 3 months 2.56 mm ( P = 0.001) and at 9 months interval 3.2 mm ( P < 0.001).

The difference in pre-SPF with a detection probability was highly significant (p < 0.001) if compared to the values of the deterministic model or to the stochastic model (using either risk-based or standard sample sizes for calculation).

Similarly, MDA-MB-468 showed a 7.4% and 6.9% increase in bound NADH on the 3.0 mg/mL and 1.2 mg/mL substrates, respectively, marking a highly significant change (p < 0.001) when compared to the cells plated on glass.

specialised and unspecialised staff (mean 4.6, sd 1.4) was highly significant (2-tailed Kruskall-Wallis test P =< 0.001) (Figure 5 ).

Results Purine derivatives There were highly significant differences ( P < 0.001) in the purine derivatives in sheep.

Multivariate analysis identified three of the 49 variables as highly significant independent predictors for the development of mediastinitis: obesity (OR 1.03, 95% CI [1.01; 1.04] p = 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 3.30, 95% CI [1.58; 6.88], p = 0.001), and bilateral grafting of the internal mammary artery (OR 3.18, 95% CI [1.20; 8.43] p = 0.02).

The reduction in ED achieved with the dose reduction protocol was highly significant ( P < 0.001, 95% CI 0.82–1.32).

There was little evidence of diurnal variability in concentrations of viruses, though there were some highly significant trends ( p < 0.001). pH and turbidity of wastewater In the effluent samples collected at Betws-y-Coed, higher pH values were observed during the summer sampling event (median pH 7.36) than during the autumn and the winter sampling campaigns (median pH 6.79 and 6.62, respectively; Fig. 2 ) with little variation evident during the sampling events (Fig. 3 d–f).

Overall, glands with a mixed infection had a highly significant larger average total area of trypanosomes than glands infected with a single strain ( P < 0.001, Tukey post-hoc ) (Fig. 8A ).

The increase in incidence rate among women was highly significant when comparing the three age groups (p < 0.001).

Statistical significance was evaluated based on adjusted P values (FDR), with thresholds set as follows: P < 0.05 (*) was considered statistically significant, P < 0.01 (**) indicated a highly significant difference, and P < 0.001 (***) denoted an extremely significant difference.

Agricultural practice had a highly significant effect on the soil microbial biomass C ( p < 0.001), but water content and its interaction with agricultural practice not (Supplementary Table S1 ).

We compared the average age of patients with different tumor types using the ANOVA test, and we found that there are highly significant statistical differences between them (p=0.001).

This M/F difference is highly significant (χ 2 p -value < 0.001) Next, we compared recombination rates in male and female meiosis interval-by-interval ( Figure 1 C).

A highly significant negative correlation with GAF was obtained (r = -0.903; p < 0.001) pointing to a reasonable degree of concurrent validity.