“highly significant”

The overall ANOVA was highly significant (F(4) = 16.54, p < .001), indicating that the D1 was able to discriminate between therapeutic security profiles of mentally disordered offenders.

Changes within each supplement group were analyzed by paired t -test using http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/Service/Statistics/Student_t_Test.html Group comparisons were done by unpaired t -test using http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/Service/Statistics/2Sample_Student_t_Test.html Results After 10 days of supplementation, both supplements produced highly significant increases in plasma lutein values (Fig. 1 , p < 0.001 for each treatment, paired t -test).

Correlation analysis The crude correlation among the two dietary instruments was highly significant for total fluid consumption in mL/d ( r = 0.73; p < 0.001).

However, it is unlikely that this would explain the findings as most of the associations found in this study were highly significant at P <0.001.

Patients with a STATE score ≥18 had a median survival of 21 months, while those with a STATE score <18 had a median survival of 9 months; the difference was highly significant with a p value <0.001.

Highly significant and perfect correlation was found between SAA and CRP in patients with attack (r= 0,939, p<0,001).

After propensity score matching, there was a 29.5 % risk reduction of all-cause mortality in MM group compared to control group and the difference in their survival time was highly significant (P < 0.001) by the log-rank test.

Replicating the effects observed at the end of rCPT stage 4 training, DBA showed a highly significant reduction in d ′ across the session that was not observed in C57 mice (strain × time bin interaction: F (2, 44) = 18.28, p < 0.001).

The differences in GFAP levels between TBI patients and controls were highly significant at all time intervals ( P < 0.001 for each comparison).

Between both the groups, GFC showed highly significant improvement which was prominently visible within 1 month of injection than PRP ( P < 0.001).

A likelihood-ratio test comparing the model with a standard logistic regression model was highly significant (likelihood ratio test=1466.50; p<0.001).

By 2-sided Fisher exact test, the association of anti-NPC with AIM was highly significant: for AIM versus all disease and normal controls, OR 42.4 (95% CI 2.3–796), p = 0.001; AIM vs disease controls only, OR 36.7 (95% CI 1.96–688), p = 0.0016.

The frequency of cancer in pure DM (21%) compared with all patients with OM (n = 0/66, 0%) was statistically highly significant (p = 0.001, OR 37.5, 95%CI 1.98 to 709 by 2-tailed Fisher exact test).

Hence, a highly significant difference was observed between the expression of TFF3 in lung ADC and lung SCC ( P < 0.001).

11 Performing a proportional hazard assumption test for our data found highly significant violation of this assumption ( P < 0.001, data have not been shown).

The multivariate tests revealed a highly significant effect of sex on the acoustic structure of bellows (Wilks’ Lambda = 0.087 F 10, 21 = 21.914, P < 0.001).

All differences in change were highly significant (p<0.001) except ‘growth’ (p = 0.7).

Windows that accounted for more than 1 % of the genomic variation were considered significant, as all windows explaining >1.0 % genomic variation were determined to be highly significant ( P < 0.001) after bootstrap analysis for other traits with similar heritability [ 17 ].

Combined use of oxytocin and ARM was 41.7% and 77.2% in misoprostol and Foley catheter group, respectively, and statistically it was very highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The curve-fitting estimations, based on least-squares regression analysis, resulted in highly significant findings using the ANOVA F test in all cases ( G ′ p = 0.001 and η ′ p = 0.006).

The outcome after 4 months approached statistical significance ( p =0.0503) but was highly significant ( p <0.001) after 12 months TLA use ( Fig. 2 ).

DISCUSSION ON RESULTS The result of the study revealed that, a combination of Brahmyadi compound and Shilajatu Vati has a definite role in lowering BP, which also showed statistically highly significant results with P < 0.001.

There was a highly significant (p < 0.001) interactive effect of age with grand-maternal diet on telomere length at 6 months of age, strongly suggesting accelerated ageing of the ovarian tissue in the recuperated group.

On the basis of the number of participants in the two groups who moved from offender to non-offender status during the follow-up period, the highly significant effect of treatment ( P < 0.001, Fisher’s exact test) is 0.32 to 0.49 (Cramer, a medium to large effect).

On comparison between the GCP and control (χ 2 = 15.57) the distribution of genotypes was highly significant ( P < 0.001).