“highly significant”

Females had a highly significant correlation between height and PEFR (r=0.532, P<0.001).

Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) showed that the between-population variation accounts for 41% of the total molecular variation and the genetic divergence was highly significant ( F st = 0.256; P < 0.001).

A highly significant ( P < 0.001) Moran's I -test result indicated spatial dependence.

The Wald statistic was highly significant for all main fixed effects, both when the effects were fitted in a forward and in a backward sequence (p < 0.001) (Table 4 ).

However, the differences in δ 15 N isotope values were highly significant ( F 4,28 = 12.99, p < 0.001) (Table 2 ).

Highly significant difference was present if P ≤0.001.

Statistically, there is a highly significant association between OCD and college years ( p < 0.001); this aligns with the previous study conducted among Brazilian medical students [ 4 ]; the authors demonstrated that severe obsessive-compulsive symptoms were associated with being in the first year, having depressive symptoms and difficulty in adaptation.

A highly significant reduction of RRF loss rate from −0.97 ± 0.3 to 0.27 ± 0.4 mL/min/month was observed in patients on incremental PD ( P < 0.001), which was only marginally the case in patients on HD (from −0.99 ± 0.48 to −0.77 ± 0.5 mL/min/month, P = 0.06).

Linear and quadratic terms of temperature were highly significant, P < 0.001, while the linear and quadratic terms of pH were significant ( P < 0.05) for α -L-rhamnosidase activity ( Table 4 ).

The analyses found that there is a highly significant difference in social presence between introverts and extroverts t (44) = −3.23, p = .001 and a highly significant difference in sense of community between introverts and extroverts t (127) = −3.83, p < .001.

Results Modified VAR regression of NYC area COVID-19 caseload trends proves highly significant modelling capacity of observed patterns in longitudinal disease incidence (county R 2 range: 0.9221–0.9751, all p < 0.001).

Gene set tests were highly significant for both Schmid versus wildtype and Cog versus wildtype ( p ≤0.001 in each case).

Most participants (82.4%) had experience of caring for a dying patient, while fewer (22.1%) had cared for a dying patient within the last month. Construct validity The KMO value of the nurse-specific EPCS-C was 0.964 and Bartlett’s test was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

Identities were accepted in some cases if the above parameters were met and only one peptide match was found along with an expected value that was highly significant ( P <0.001) for the peptide match and the MASCOT protein score was 70 or greater for that single peptide match.

Across all subjects there was a highly significant correlation between vessel Aβ40 density and vessel Aβ42 density (Spearman rho = 0.855, P < .001).

Similarly, there was a highly significant ( P < 0.001) positive correlation between FACIT-F and physical (+0.70) and emotional scores (+0.45) of QOL.

Highly significant genetic variations ( p < 0.001) were observed for BSR disease incidence (DI) in all field screening tests and disease rating and area under the disease progress curve in the greenhouse.

Results The statistical comparison between groups I, II, III, and IV casts measurements by using the Mann–Whitney test showed highly significant statistical difference between the various groups from each other ( p < 0.001) Conclusion The accuracy of the working casts obtained from group III impression (two-step using 1 mm coping) was the best, whereas it was least with group II impression (two-step using polyethylene spacer).

This is in line with a previous study, which found a highly significant correlation ( p < .001) between AQ scores and OCPD traits ( Gadelkarim et al., 2019 ).

The intragroup comparison of the CFU/mL count showed a highly significant reduction from baseline to post-intervention for both the groups ( p = 0.001).

* represents P < 0.05 (significant), ** represents P < 0.01 (highly significant), and *** represents P < 0.001 (very highly significant).

Soybean Yield Responses to the Increase in Average Temperature Over the Past 50 Years Our long‐term analysis across eight soybean production systems (rotation × tillage) showed that yields improved as average air temperatures increased, with highly significant relationships ( p = 0.001) observed for both rotation systems (Figure 4 ).

Results Ratings of negative emotions The main effect of the regulation type was found to be highly significant ( F (2,174) = 303, p < 0.001, η p 2 = 0.777): participants reported fewer negative feelings in the reappraisal (3.0 ± 1.1) and distraction blocks (3.0 ± 1.0) when compared with the passive view (no-regulation) block (5.6 ± 1.1, p s < 0.001), whereas the negative feelings between the reappraisal and distraction blocks did not differ ( p = 1.000).

The obtained data clearly indicated a highly significant inverse correlation between the HADS-A and MAAS scores of these patients ( r = -0.360, P < 0.001).

Leaflet morphology further distinguished the diploid and tetraploid lineages, with a Wilcoxon rank-sum test applied to untransformed data revealing highly significant differences (p < 0.001) in leaflet width and length-to-width ratios across apical, lateral, and basal leaflets (Fig. 2A, B ).