“highly significant”

When p RBCs were the target cells, there was a highly significant positive correlation between anti-Neu5Gc IgG and anti-nonGal IgG (P<0.001) ( Fig 5C ).

ANOVA with post-hoc trend analysis for increasing FAK phosphorylation with increasing stiffness was highly significant ( p < 0.001).

The inhibition of SCC7 cancer cells migration in the cisplatin and nPDA-cis balls groups was highly significant ( P < 0.001) ( Figure 7A ).

The mean change in VHN was +18.52 ± 3.54 in the experimental group and -2.55 ± 2.73 in the control group, with a highly significant intergroup difference (p < 0.001).

AMOVA was used to determine that variation among and within groups was highly significant ( P < 0.001), with the clusters capturing 31.5% of the total genetic variations, while 68.3% was explained by individuals within populations ( Table 2 ).

This shift toward His-containing genotypes was highly significant ( P <0.001) and accompanied by markedly elevated odds ratios, indicating a strong risk effect of the His allele, particularly in homozygous form.

Most importantly, there was a highly significant difference in the rates of definite and probable ScT at 2 years (3.5% with BVS vs. 0.9% with metallic DES, p < 0.001).

Each step from HPP to SSA to SSA‐D revealed a highly significant increase in diameter (each p < 0.001, Table 1 ).

A highly significant overexpression of ZEB1 with tumor grade, nodal metastasis, and FIGO stage (p<0.001 for each) was detected ( Table 3 ), ( Figure 4 ).

However, the three inulin groups exhibited higher Bifidobacterium levels than the HC group, with a highly significant difference observed between the InH/InM and HC groups (P < 0.001) and a significant difference between the InL and HC groups (P < 0.05).

The mean HDRS score showed a highly significant difference between the two groups ( p < .001).

The statistical model revealed a highly significant interaction between diet and day ( p < 0.001), indicating that the response of laying hens to the object varied significantly between the dietary groups over time.

The effect of trap type was, however, highly significant (F 2, 77.8 = 26.42, p < 0.001) and is further investigated below.

A highly significant effect of time on feed intake (df = 8; F = 30.27, p < 0.001) as well as a significant group vs. week interaction (df = 48; F = 8.27, p < 0.001) were also observed, which indicates that temporal variations in feed intake differed between groups.

Among these pathways, four pathways were highly significant at P <0.001.

The moderate but highly significant genetic differentiation observed between the two sub-clusters (F ST = 0.149, p < 0.001) corroborates the spatial discontinuity identified by the EEMS analysis.

A highly significant association was observed between disease-free status and OS (p < 0.001).

A weak, but highly significant, positive association between the number of days survived and the number of days with spittle excretions was detected (linear regression: F 1,29 = 30.44, p < 0.001, r 2 = 0.197; Figure 6 A).

The difference between the sexes was highly significant (Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.001).

The analysis showed a highly significant effect (F = 1378.68, p < 0.001), confirming the model’s reliability in predicting temperature changes over time, with an R2 of 0.92.

At 12 months, the difference between groups was highly significant ( P < .001), diarrhea being reported more by patients in group C than those in group A or B.

Due to the non-normal distribution of data, we compared behaviors performed in different seasons using the Two-Independent-Samples Kolmogorov–Smirnov test, between the mating season and other seasons and between winter and other seasons, with significant levels (2-tailed) set at p < 0.05 (significant at the 0.05 level), p < 0.01 (highly significant at the 0.01 level), and p < 0.001 (extremely significant at the 0.001 level). 3.

orthobotrys crude extract and fractions at 50, 100, 150 mg/kg exhibited highly significant ( p < 0.001) concentration dependent suppression of synovial cavity swelling when compared to arthritic control.

CCL7 was shown to be significantly increased in sera and SF from RA patients compared to that from osteoarthritis (OA) patients ( p < 0.01), and to have a highly significant correlation with the level of anti-CCP (R = 0.93, p = 0.001).

Table 1 shows P value is highly significant ( P = 0.001).