“highly significant”

As seen in Figure-3 oncological outcome differed highly significant between cN0 organ-confined, cN0 locally advanced, low-risk and high-risk group (p <0.001).

Highly significant values ( p <0.001) are marked with an asterisk (*).

Moreover heterogeneity across the studies was found to be highly significant (p<0.001, I 2 = 95%).

Benthic-pelagic Coupling: Effects on Nematode Community Structure There was a highly significant and strong reduction in core surface area from the GB region to the eastern Mediterranean (Spearman rank, r = -0.74, P<0.001).

Further analysis with Spearman's correlation revealed a highly significant moderate negative correlation between AOR and language outcome (Spearman rho = −0.435, n = 52, p = 0.001; Fig 1B ).

Statistical Analysis The data were analyzed by Duncan's multiple range test at ( p <0.05) was accepted as statistically significant, and highly significant when ( p <0.001), using the SPSS software.

There was a highly significant difference in "cause" and "measurement" between the newspapers owned by majority stockholders and the newspapers owned by minority stockholders ( p <0.001).

The diet regimens rendered the diet group a weight fall of on average 3.5 kg, which is highly significant compared to the controls, who lost 0.1 kg (p < 0.001; Student's t-test).

The correlation coefficients for the CADi and weighted CADi scores were highly significant (CADi: r = 0.47, P < 0.001, weighted CADi: r = 0.55, P < 0.001).

CKO mice also exhibited a lower VO 2 ( p = 0.04) but without a significant difference in VCO 2 ( p = 0.348), yet with a highly significant increase in RER ( p < 0.001).

There was highly significant extra-Poisson variation in the numbers of cases not only between flu seasons and between quarters within flu seasons, but also between months within quarters (p<0.001 in each instance).

The mean score of teamwork perceptions increased from T0 (91.02 ± 31.10) to T1 (145.27 ± 12.87) and T2 (142.30 ± 15.74), with highly significant values in repeated measures two-way ANOVA (f = 307.06, p < 0.001) and paired t-tests results (p1 < 0.001, and p2 < 0.001).

These three percentages were highly significantly different (χ 2 = 19.7; P < 0.001), with a highly significant linear trend ( P < 0.001).

The effect of hydrogen peroxide on the “fraction of fluorescence signal outside of the pyrenoid” was highly significant (P<.001), and we thank the reviewer for their suggestion.

The chi-square test comparing proportions of concordant causes of death between categories was highly significant (p<0.001), suggesting that the concordance in causes of death between CORR and ISQ data did not occur by chance.

All differences were highly significant in the chi 2 test ( p < 0.001).

In the M1 cortex, this increase in neuronal density was accompanied by a highly significant thinning of both the M1 (F(Genotype) 1,31 = 67.164, p<.001; Fig. 7F ) and somatosensory (S1) cortex (F(Genotype) 1,30 = 41.368, p<.001).

Consistent with the pathophysiological features of PA, patients demonstrated characteristic biochemical abnormalities, including significantly increased PAC and ARR, decreased DRC, and lower serum potassium levels compared to the EH group, and these differences remained highly significant ( P < 0.001) in both males and females upon stratified analysis (Table 1 ).

Results Evolutionary allometry The multivariate regression of Procrustes coordinates (PRC) on centroid size (CS) is highly significant ( F 1, 42 = 32.18; P <0.001), accounting for 12.93% of total shape variation ( Fig. 2 ).

3.4 Predictors of high BP among the study population The univariate analysis shows highly significant ( P < .001) association for most of the risk factors of high BP (Table S1 ).

There was a highly significant effect of subgenus on species mortality (P<0.001), where 54 seedlings were lost from subgenus Eucalyptus and 31 from subgenus Symphyomyrtus .

The correlation was weak ( r = −.18) but highly significant ( p < .001), given the large sample size.

Associations were considered highly significant at a threshold of P < 0.001.

Both factors were highly significant ( P < 0.001), as was the interaction ( P < 0.001; Fig. 2 ), indicating that bacterial inoculation significantly ( P < 0.01) stimulated growth of the WT and eto1-1 plants but not the etr1-1 and ein2-1 mutants ( Fig. 2 ).

Both PFS and OS were highly significant between two groups (P < 0.001) (Figure 1 ).