“highly significant”

Both in the supine position and at end‐tilt the relations were highly significant (all four: p < 0.0001).

There was a highly significant effect of genotype on stride length (F 1,32 = 63.9, p <0.0001, 2-way repeated measures ANOVA).

To statistically confirm this trend, a Jonckheere–Terpstra test was performed, revealing a highly significant positive trend between LT4 dosage and FT4 levels (JT = 2,029,623, P < 0.0001).

The results in Table 7 demonstrate a highly significant difference among algorithms ( P <0.0001), substantiating the robustness of bDTOPRS in feature selection.

The difference in the slopes between the Braf wild type and mutant mucosal samples was highly significant ( P <0.0001), reflecting the temporal accumulation of DNA methylation events following induction of the Braf mutation.

These reductions were highly significant (ANOVA, F = 55.9, P < 0.0001) and 90% of mosquitoes died within 20 minutes of exposure (Figure 2 ).

Non-spatial linear regression of altitude on logarithm transformed concentrations of cyanogens showed highly significant association, (p < 0.0001).

The correlation coefficients among these three indicators are rather high: 0.31 between anxiety and loneliness, 0.21 between uselessness and loneliness, and 0.18 between uselessness and anxiety; all of them are highly significant (p < 0.0001).

Table 2 shows that there was a highly significant difference in the mean of P300 latency between mild and severe ( P < 0.0001), mild and very severe ( P < 0.0003), moderate and severe ( P < 0.0001), moderate and very severe ( P < 0.001), and between severe and very severe ( P < 0.01) level of depression.

These values were all highly significant (p < 0.0001).

This highly significant difference (p<0.0001) indicates that EdU-negative mitotic cells (pH3 positive) had been in G2- or M-phase for at least 24 hours prior to fixation.

A 2 time (pre- and posttest) × 3 group (2 d, 4 d, 10 d) ANOVA with time as a repeated measure showed this to be highly significant ( F (1,21) = 52.392, P < 0.0001, r = 0.84).

These stress conditions were associated with a highly significant increase in area under the curve (AUC) ( P <0.0001), as published previously. 5 , 35 Cortisol levels were determined from saliva collection 36 by direct radioimmunoassay (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Webster, TX, USA).

A highly significant positive correlation ( ρ = 0.95, P < 0.0001) between expression levels and the normalized difference between ω mus and ω cas ( δ ω ) provides confirmatory support for our results ( fig. 3 B ).

Spearman rank-correlation also provided a highly significant correlation between the results (Spearman's rho = 0.933, df = 99, p < 0.0001, 95% CI for rho 0.903-0.955).

The results showed highly significant (( P < 0.0001) linear correlations ( r = 0.9784–0.9907) between the Trp values determined by GC and HPLC for both the low-normal and normal-high ranges (data not shown) and between the Trp values determined by GC and the standard fluorimetric method ( r = 0.9774) (Fig. 2 ).

behavioral data that includes all rats, including those that that fell outside of our lesion criteria, continued to show highly significant differences between inosine- and saline-treated rats (BBB: P < 0.0001; Ladder-rung P < 0.0001).

Those shifts ranged from a modest four-percentage-point increase in support of legalization to a substantial 12-point jump in the share who said it us “safe for pit bulls to live in residential neighborhoods.” The differences in percentages from 2014 to 2018 for the first three questions in Figure 1 are all highly significant ( p < 0.0001), while the four-point difference in support for legalization shown in the final column of the figure is marginally significant ( p = 0.06).

The slope coefficient (0.2974) was highly significant ( p < 0.0001), reinforcing the conclusion that a strong linear relationship exists between initial and later tumor volumes.

Prin1 showed a highly significant correlation to the genomic GC content ( R = 0.9394, p < 0.0001), indicating that, to a large extent, genomic GC content determined amino acid usage.

vexans was found (p = 0.95); however, highly significant differences were found between the mean OMS temperatures for Cx . pipiens and Cx . quinquefasciatus , and Ae . vexans and Cx . quinquefasciatus (both p<0.0001).

Prediction power of the model is highly significant ( P < 0.0001).

Statistical analysis confirmed highly significant differences among the three tissue types (F = 152.63, p < 0.0001), with multiple comparison analysis showing significant differences between cancellous bone and knee cartilage, cancellous bone and muscle, and knee cartilage and muscle (all p < 0.0001).

Strikingly, the activity in lymphoblasts showed a highly significant positive correlation with levels of DHRSX protein in this cell line (see Figure 1 J) (NADH: R 2 = 0.9667; p < 0.0001, NADPH: R 2 = 0.9910; p < 0.0001; Figure 3 E).

The model-based algorithm picked up 1314 of these missed cases, at a cost of 502 additional false positives, and provided highly significant incremental information (p<0.0001) within this group of patients.