The Chi-squared statistic for Friedman’s test of the ‘overall change over time’ in our parameters of interest, VAS, NPS, SNOT-22 and IgE, and whatever group analysed, is highly significant ( p < 0.001 in most cases).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
The AUD group showed a predominant pattern of hyperconnectivity among all significant connections (25 of 29 connections, p < 0.05) ( Figure 5 , panels a–e) as well as among 12 highly significant connections (11 of 12 connections, p ≤ 0.001) ( Figure 6 ), where parahippocampal connections with other DMN regions were predominant (13 connections overall; six highly significant connections).
These results indicate a consistent and significant decrease in biofilm density across all tested MOIs compared to the control, with each group showing highly significant reductions ( p < 0.001), as illustrated in Figure 4 .
ANOVA of all the traits indicated highly significant genotype effects ( p < 0.001) and environmental (replicate) effects ( p < 0.001) ( Table 1 ).
For all assessments, p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: The expressions of candidate cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6, CRP, and WBC) were highly significant (p<0.001) in T2DM.
The statistical model was highly significant (F = 25.143, p < 0.001), suggesting that at least one predictor has a significant impact on mental health.
Instead, the suppression remains highly significant throughout photostimulation (−0.43±0.08; n=9 animals, p<0.001; one-sample t test; Figure 3bii , left bar).
Also, there is highly significant decrease ( P <0.001) of PW/RT ratio, insulin, and amylase levels, the number and diameter of islets of Langerhans, the number of PCNA positive immunoreactive cells, and the number of insulin positive β-cells.
A higher percentage of PG students (187/203, 92.1%) were aware of mpox compared to UG students (314/402, 78.1%), and this difference was highly significant (p<0.001).
Additionally, Table 4 indicates a highly significant difference in time management skills between the age groups (p < 0.001).
The hematologic recovery (following withdrawal of rEPO) with and without immunosuppressive therapy was highly significant (57% vs. 2%, respectively, P < 0.001), and nearly 95% had complete recovery following renal transplantation ( n = 19 cases).
Jss and Kp values for 5-FU-NE3-Gel were determined to be 12.0244 ± 1.12 μg/cm 2 /h and 1.2024 ± 0.073 μg × 10 –3 , respectively, which were also highly significant in comparison of 5-FU-S (P < 0.001).
However, further adjusting for BMI, resulted in significant difference between the two groups in the odds of hypertension, which was higher in HIV-infected individuals (P = 0.001, Fig 1 , model 3), and there was a trend towards higher odds of diabetes in HIV-infected individuals although the difference did not reach the nominal significance level (P = 0.112); the difference in the odds of dyslipidemia became more prominent while that of current smokers became less prominent (although still highly significant; P<0.001), as did for high SCORE (with the difference becoming marginally not significant; P = 0.105).
In both subgroups of participants, with two or only one MVA vaccination, and younger than 50 years, we found an increasing OPXV ATI-N antibody prevalence with increasing number of partners (combining the two subgroups we tested the association with partner numbers in a Chi2 test, which was highly significant p < 0.001), suggesting that undiagnosed Mpox infections may have contributed to the OPXV antibody prevalence (see Table 4 ).
The effect of the compounds on membrane stabilization was also determined which showed that compounds 4APZ (120 and 240 mg/kg doses), 4APZAB (160 mg/kg) and 4APZVn (600 mg/kg) produced highly significant inhibition ( P < 0.001) of hypotonicity-induced haemolysis.
The mean reduction at 6 months follow up in the patients compared to baseline in the parameters like AST (50.31%), ALT (48.77%) and TG (59.71%) was highly significant ( p <0.001).
The RC versus SC comparison in Table 1 shows that the probability of correctly assigning a resistant or susceptible individual to the correct group is better than 98%; this value differs from random allocations (50:50) by a highly significant ( p < 0.001) margin.
RESULTS The NOT-P, MNA ® scores, TC, HDL, iron, and Vitamin D 3 levels ranked higher in the controls, followed by mild/moderate/severe periodontitis groups, with highly significant (HS) differences ( P < 0.001).
In addition, a highly significant correlation ( p < 0.001) was observed between pneumonia-risk score and the expected survival, thus confirming pulmonary infections as a major cause of death in OLT recipients.
The mixed model analysis of variance revealed highly significant effects of species and of treatment on T leaf ( Table 1 ; p < 0.001).
The H obs values differed significantly among breeds (1-way ANOVA), and all pairwise comparisons of H obs were also highly significant ( P < 0.001).
The pathological tumor stage (pT) was highly significant overall ( p < 0.001), with pT 1 (HR = 3.434, p < 0.001), pT 2 (HR = 4.289, p < 0.001), and pT3 (HR = 4.512, p = 0.014) all showing substantial increased risks of earlier death.
A highly significant increase ( P < .001) in TBARs among ML3 was observed as compared to the control and ML2 group.
Comparison of all females with a cancer diagnosis under the age of 18 years with their age-matched controls shows that there is a highly significant difference in the chance of a first livebirth ( P < 0.001) (Fig. 1 ).
The Wilcoxon signed-rank test shows a highly significant difference between participation in each type of activity ( Z = −6.05, p < 0.001).