A highly significant negative relationship between relatedness and spatial distance between pairs of individuals was found using both microsatellites ( b = -0.039, P < 0.001; Figure 4 A) and mtDNA ( b Loiselle = -0.055; b Nij = -0.067; both P < 0.001; Figure 4 B).
← all phrases
“highly significant”
Sighted at
p=0.09
In the literature
There was a highly significant association between wild IDH1 and glioma progression (P<0.001), as 96.8% of wild IDH1 showed progression and mutant IDH1 showed a mean of about 30 months survival compared with about 13 months for those with wild IDH1 .
Results Chi-square test revealed significant ( p = 0.001*) and highly significant ( p < 0.001**) differences in diagnostic accuracy regarding the categories “staging” and “grading” in all compared groups when using the diagnostic algorithms (Table 4 ).
The regression analysis in Figure 5 indicates the highly significant linear relation between risk and management intensity indexes (R 2 = 0.677, P < 0.001).
The difference in knowledge levels about the negative effects of smoking and toxic tobacco substances from cigarettes among students from different departments and colleges was highly significant (P<0.001).
In our study, we report a highly significant statistical association between the presence of hr-HPV infection and detection of methylated P16INK4A forms ( p < 0.001) as showed by SPATHIS et al. 19 .
In all three phenotypic classes and for both DE and GE assays, genotype, temperature, and their interaction all had highly significant ( P <0.001; Table 1 ) effects on cold tolerance.
In contrast, the oxidized form of CoQ 10 , ubiquinone, had a stronger positive correlation with serum GGT activity in women (p < 0.001) than in men (p < 0.01), and interestingly, there was a highly significant positive correlation between the redox state and serum GGT activity solely in women (p < 0.001).
The analysis revealed a highly significant statistical difference, with a p -value of ≤0.001.
The difference in the slopes between BASE and either SR or RCV is highly significant ( p < 0.001; see Table 2 in S1 File for confidence intervals and p-values).
The GCS score of patients in the endoscopic group at admission was 8.02 ±2.01, while in the puncture group it was 6.10 ±2.13, with a highly significant difference ( p < 0.001).
Our results showed a highly significant difference in the genotype frequencies of TNF-α (−376 G/A) SNP between S-AKI and non-AKI patients ( p < 0.001).
motility, gut and tail) phenotypes in the 5 ng MO1 morphants versus embryos administered CTL MO was highly significant (Fisher's exact test, P < 0.001).
Self-reported excessive bleeding was highly significant in rural Nabiganj (13%) compared to urban Dhaka (6%; p < 0.001).
A highly significant association between worse patient outcome (overall survival and disease free survival) and negative CADM1 protein expression could be found in both data sets (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006) (Figure 4 ).
Adjusted linear mixed model analyses showed a highly significant positive effect of motivation at Baseline (importance, p < .001, readiness, p = .011) and a significant negative effect of positive symptoms at Baseline on changes in levels of physical activity ( p = .016).
05 ) at 4 months and highly significant increase ( p < 0. 001 ) at 6 months compared to the traditional system.
The correlation between bleeding and mortality was highly significant (p < 0.001, OR = 5.296), as well as the correlation between bleeding score and in-hospital bleeding (p < 0.001, OR = 1.058), and between bleeding score and in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR = 1.121, p < 0.001, area under the ROC curve 0.753, p < 0.001).
All pairs were highly significant ( p <0.001), suggesting that individual trial averages share a degree of similarity with the participants' average when including only a couple of ERP trials.
-0.79, P =0.448) with a highly significant correlation ( R =0.813, P <0.001). 3.
In fact, TPC showed highly significant correlations with antioxidant activity (r = +0.893, p < 0.001).
Assessment of goodness of fit indicated that the overall model was highly significant ( p < 0.001, adjusted R 2 = 0.334).
However, when the cups offered 10 3 ppm p -cresol, the group effect was highly significant (P < 0.001, two-way ANOVA): 10 3 ppm was deterrent in comparison with water (P < 0.001, post hoc pairwise t -test with Holm correction) and also in comparison with 10 1 ppm (P = 0.015, post hoc pairwise t -test with Holm correction), while 10 2 , 10 1 ppm were not significantly different from water or each other (Figure 6 b).
Chlorophyll concentration and seedling growth characteristics showed highly significant positive associations with NUE ( P < 0.001).
Ultrasonography showed a highly significant correlation between TFC and TOV ( r =0.447, p <0.001) ( Figure 1B ).